I didnt sabotage anything
People argue that he's a scrub. When the warriors are successful, they say the team is stacked. When the Warriors struggle, Draymond is washed.
Wiggins made the all-star team this season, and NO ONE outside of Warriors fans agreed with it. Said he only made it because of KPop voters.
Wiggins made the all-star team because Kawhi and PG were injured. If he was a legit all-star, more teams would have tried to get him 2 years agoClaiming that Draymond wouldn't be able to start on most teams without Curry is nonsense. A defender of his caliber with 0 offensive skill would still start, and he often benefits his team offensively as well with his passing. Off the top of my head the Celtics, Heat, and Bucks are the only squads that might not have started him this year, depending on how they wanted to play.
Most of the rest of what you say is accurate, and it still adds up to a stacked team.
Steph was an MVP candidate
Wiggins was a legitimate all-star even if he was a weak all-star starter
Draymond was an all-star and DPOY candidate
Klay took time getting back and yet was still a 20ppg scorer and elite shooter
Poole did get hot and was near a 20ppg scorer himself
It wasn't like the Warriors ripped up the league all season, they only won 53 games. But at the end of the year, they had a stacked roster. And the lineups they ended up facing in the West were ass.
Denver with no Murray or MPJ
Memphis with no Ja
Dallas with no Porzingis or Hardaway
Give me a fukking break with that shyt. Golden State was favored by a mile in all three of those matchups.
Your team averaged 92ppg in your 4 Finals losses. That doesn't have jack shyt to do with Curry.
Your team shot 37% with 18 turnovers, 40% with 15 turnovers, 41% with 18 turnovers, and 42% with 22 turnovers in your 4 Finals losses. That doesn't have jack shyt to do with Curry.
Your star player was 24 for 76 (31%) from 2pt range for the series. From TWO-POINT range. That isn't Curry.
Warriors (especially Wiggins and Draymond) played great defense but y'all also screwed the pooch. Curry had a terrific Finals but if y'all hadn't played like ass on offense it would have been a different series.
You destroyed your own argument again. Who gives a fukk about Coli threads, how about we look at the actual voting?
Players ranked Draymond as #3 frontcourt and Wiggins as #5
Media ranked Draymond as #4 frontcourt and Wiggins as #6
So both the players and the media CLEARLY have Draymond and Wiggins as All-Stars this year. In fact the players would have had Draymond starting!!!
The Warriors objectively had 3 all-stars this year, the only such team in the NBA, and neither the players nor the media had any doubt that all three deserved it. Then they had a 20ppg guy and an 18ppg guy as their 4th and 5th players, and were solid 8-deep.
Reality biting you in the ass.
Wiggins made the all-star team because Kawhi and PG were injured. If he was a legit all-star, more teams would have tried to get him 2 years ago
The warriors beating the grizzlies doesnt mean their roster is stacked.
Dallas traded porzingis for bertans and Spender Dinwiddie (who were healthy). Why the fukk would "no porzingis" be a factor. And Tim Hardaway was having an AWFUL season before he got injured. He was a bad defender and before he got injured, he was shooting the ball like shyt
so wtf are you talking about, really?
Steph's presence makes the team better, and makes them more impactful when he shares the court with them. That is why the team looks stacked.
Clearly the poster who made the claim did so under the impression that Curry would still be the teams engine, best player, leading scorer, etc…I didn't assume anything. I'm saying we have literally no idea what role Steph will have individually for the next 5 years, so how can you claim you know for certain what his individual legacy would be solely based on his team accomplishments?
Two years from now the Warriors could have 3-4 all-stars without Steph. So I wouldn't assume anything based off of team performance alone. Even if Steph is a great, all-star level starter in 2 years, does it not make a difference whether the team is carried by him or carried by an ensemble cast?
Imagine if 2010-2014 had worked out differently for the Heat. Let's imagine that Wade and Bosh never get hurt, Wade continues in his 2009 form while Bosh makes a bit of a leap. Bron steps back to let them both shine and acts as the distributor and 3rd option, let's say he averages 20-8-8 and has a couple nice playoff games but nothing remarkable. The Heat win 4 straight titles.
Then he goes to the Cavs, Kyrie and Love never get hurt and Durant never goes to the Warriors, Bron continues to defer. Over the next 6 years the Cavs win 3 titles with Kyrie winning 2 Finals MVPs and Bron gets his first one.
Bron would have 7 rings. Would that leave Bron with a better all-time legacy than he has, just because he had more rings? Would he now be better than MJ?
That's why basing all-time future claims on "If they get this many rings then...." is stupid. Rings are a team accomplishment. If you don't know the circumstances, and you don't even know how they played, how can you be certain you know their legacy?
He used to be the most widely accepted G.O.A.T. before Jordan came along.bill russell has 11. is he the goat?
1. "if" statements. using hypotheticals to justify your pointIf no one was injured then the Warriors might not have made the 2nd round.
Wiggins was an all-star out of the players who actually played this year. And those are the only ones who mattered.
You were all bragging about preseason projections, and I'm pointing out that those teams were nowhere near their preseason projections.
You lied and said the Warriors weren't projected to make the playoffs when they were projected about 48-49 wins, just 4 fewer than what they got. And all the teams above them either got injured or badly underperformed.
Steph didn't play any better this year than anyone expected him to. But Wiggins/Poole stepped up and a bunch of other teams fell out due to circumstances.
ThEn WhY dInD't ThEy LoOk StAcKeD lAsT yEaR?
Steph was far better last year, and the Warriors didn't even make the playoffs. If it's all Steph doing this and not his teammates, then why the fukk didn't he do it last season?
The difference between last year and this year ain't jack shyt to do with Steph improving. It was Klay coming back and Wiggins and Poole improving. Wiggins is still just 26 and was a #1 pick and consistent 20ppg guy in a shyt organization, he's shown improvement over the last 3 seasons. Poole is just 22 and showing the entire league who he is. There's this weird desperation from Curry stans to pretend that no one else has talent except for Curry even when his talent is quite one-dimensional and he relies on other players to take nearly every other role on the court.
KAJ was the goat before Jordan.He used to be the most widely accepted G.O.A.T. before Jordan came along.
Steph would have won 9 in a more advanced league with more teams while breaking the game with his shooting.
KAJ was never considered goatKAJ was the goat before Jordan.
So the answer is no?
Curry won’t be the goat regardless of rings
This. It's a very recent thing with KAJ being considered the goat.KAJ was never considered goat
He used to be the most widely accepted G.O.A.T. before Jordan came along.
Before Jordan came along it was Russell who was most widely considered goat
Then he’s the goat if he was the best player on those extra 5 chips well into his 40’sPeople do these dream hypotheticals for everyone besides LeBron ...
What if LeBron wins the next 5 championships ?