You do know that you can do that without making an announcement. And lolPutting you on ignore.
At the Canadian pilgrim boy and his pet Asian pilgrim dapping you. Black posters don’t fuk with you no more after that last reveal - you know it’s over.
Creh smokes another creh on cam
- Thread starter iFuxWiddit
- Start date
At the Canadian pilgrim boy and his pet Asian pilgrim dapping you. Black posters don’t fuk with you no more after that last reveal - you know it’s over.
How many people were on the video? And why are you only repeating the most extreme right-wing hack among them? When even THAT guy said it wasn't a clear-cut case, and had to rely on the fukking burglary statute (which CLEARLY doesn't apply) in order to make his case. And the others say several times that it's murder that's it's not self-defense.
Absolut
Legal Bookie
How many hosts were there? One guy dipped before they got to the relevant statutes, then the host said based on what was in Texas law he felt it was justified. The other 2 couldn’t refute that.
He was claiming it was "assault" and therefore "burglary" as his claimed relevant statute. It was a fukking streeeeeetch as hell. And even befor then he said, "it's not a clear-cut case" and "I'm not arguing for the shooter because I agree with that case, I'm just saying it's a difficult case."
Both of the others who are talking were arguing it's not self-defense and the host says his right-wing audience is split as well. In the end they eventually stop arguing with the host because he's the host, but they had already made themselves clear.
You seriously have to take the most EXTREME pro-gun anti-black right-wing legal show you could possibly fine, and even they're split on whether it's self-defense, and you think that's a win.
Absolut
Legal Bookie
I didn’t post the link, and have no clue who those people are. I’m don’t care about virtual wins. Put up some cash. No murder conviction. How much you willing to part with? That will be a winHe was claiming it was "assault" and therefore "burglary" as his claimed relevant statute. It was a fukking streeeeeetch as hell. And even befor then he said, "it's not a clear-cut case" and "I'm not arguing for the shooter because I agree with that case, I'm just saying it's a difficult case."
Both of the others who are talking were arguing it's not self-defense and the host says his right-wing audience is split as well. In the end they eventually stop arguing with the host because he's the host, but they had already made themselves clear.
You seriously have to take the most EXTREME pro-gun anti-black right-wing legal show you could possibly fine, and even they're split on whether it's self-defense, and you think that's a win.
Exactly. Why is this is hard to understand for some people?
HE WAS THERE TO PICK UP HIS SON!!
That shady bytch of a mother set him up, in the end the son wasn't in the house, and the guy she was fukking (not married, not boyfriend) killed the dad.
Apparently the deceased has 3 children, so 3 children are without their dad now.
FYI you actually can't, police won't interfere in custody disputes without specific instructions from a judge to take a specific action. If she was refusing to give up the kids, then the guy would have to go to a judge, file a case, get a judgment, and THEN the police would intervene....but since the a$$hole with the gun was connected and fathers have a tough go in those cases, it's not even certain what would happen.
In the entire meantime before that, there isn't shyt he could do to get his kids other than convincing the jerks to give them up.
It's Texas and the white guy is a conservative activist who was married to a judge. He's fukking connected as hell. How does a decision on THAT case have anything to do with right and wrong or the actual law?
* They all agreed castle doctrine plays no part because there was no forced entry
* They all agreed that "deadly force" starts the moment the first supposed warning shot was fired. At that point the victim hadn't done jack shyt other than what the host called "nipple rubbing". He hadn't even reached for the gun when he CLEARLY had every opportunity to grab it long before the shot was fired.
* They all agreed him grabbing for the gun after the shot was fired is self-defense from legal force
* Everyone other than the host agreed that the perp killed him from 10 feet away when the victim had his hands at his sides and was not doing jack shyt threatening and had no reason to be shot. The host didn't even explain clearly why he disagreed, he just said some "I dunno...." bullshyt.
* In the end the host tried to claim the victim was committing burglary justify lethal force, which was CLEARLY wrong and is the sort of legal argument you make when you have no case.
I should have said I was done with you way back already. You agree with this shooting shyt way too often to be taken seriously.
TaxCollector13459
2018 Coli Rookie of the Year
I dont even think she was answering him either.
Thats why bro said "you pull a gun on me you better be ready to use it". I dont think he was getting into it for his own sake as far as on some tough guy shyt..but more so you physically holding my kid im down to fight.
she knew he was gonna kill him, she aint try to stop him leaving at all
Absolut
Legal Bookie
You can either respect people’s boundaries and personal space, and live a nice long life, or don’t and become a case study on thecoli.com while pushing daisies. I know how people are with guns and brash decisions, and move accordingly. People running around threatening folks on their property, or pointing shower heads at cops, or trying to fight some geezer over a handicapped parking spot could have used some better judgement. Ultimately we both know no conviction will come from this. Which is the point. And dudes dead. All because he couldn’t just walk away and take shyt to the courtroom
KingFreeman
Barely-Known Member
That got me too. Im stealing that phrase- I’m starting a new wave of referring to cacs as “pilgrims and fellow pilgrims”. Rep to anyone using the term henceforth.
The tide has changed- these coli pilgrims are about to be mad asf in a frenzy.
Uh-oh. We got a replacement for "Cac" in the works?
Better make a thread and get that started asap.
I was actually thinking about doing thatUh-oh. We got a replacement for "Cac" in the works?
Better make a thread and get that started asap.
Hold this rep
Even on the gun forums the vast majority of guys are saying it was a bad shoot.
Front Porch Shooting in Lubbock, TX - AR15.COM
When coli fake militants are more hardcore about defending Texans with guns than even the gun nuts are.
Front Porch Shooting in Lubbock, TX - AR15.COM
When coli fake militants are more hardcore about defending Texans with guns than even the gun nuts are.
mc_brew
#NotMyPresident
the boyfriend did the shooting so casually i was half expecting him to bust out with a 'damn, i'm thirsty' line next....
Similar threads
