Creationists butthurt as a result of Dr Pepper ad

[Mr. Somebody]

no, these people are stubborn and ignorant enough to blow off decades worth of scientific progress, the same scientific progress that, for example, saves their life in hospitals and makes their lives easier on a daily basis. even church leaders have accepted evolution as being highly probably true, but these people are content to wallow in their ignorance, being selectively outraged by scientific progress.

by the way, im sure most of these people drink tons of soda, so your above comment was worthless and stupid. there is no debating the preceding sentence.

What creationists are currently in power that prevent whatever scientific breakthroughs you need from being released to the public?

 

[wize fool]

Mowgli is also Wize fool


dude not only has multiple personalities but each personality has a different faith


we gotta get my man to a doctor asap

Mowgli is wize fool just as Abraham is the first prophet of Islam.

Stupid is forever but ignorance can be fixed. Step into the light, friend.

 

[the cac mamba]

What creationists are currently in power that prevent whatever scientific breakthroughs you need from being released to the public?

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/washington/21stem.html?_r=0

 

[Mr. Somebody]

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/21/washington/21stem.html?_r=0

Are you for or against trials on human patients and splicing animal dna into humans?

Also, do you think the reason stem cell research isnt available to the public is solely in the hands of creationists? Thats the only reason?

 

[the cac mamba]

Are you for or against trials on human patients and splicing animal dna into humans?

Also, do you think the reason stem cell research isnt available to the public is solely in the hands of creationists? Thats the only reason?

Paralyzed Rats Walk Again After Stem Cell Transplant - Technology Review

 

[Mr. Somebody]

Paralyzed Rats Walk Again After Stem Cell Transplant - Technology Review

Can you answer my other questin though friend?

 

[the cac mamba]

Can you answer my other questin though friend?

i think creationists are, yes, a significant force driving the anti-stem cell research. as are all people who think that they know what god wants, when in fact, they dont because he has never spoken to them. they regurgitate books and stories written by men and pass them off as infallible knowledge

am i for people walking again? yes

are you a troll who was banned from sohh for consistent fakkitry? yes

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

"rats walk again after treatment! evolution is real!"

 

[the cac mamba]

"rats walk again after treatment! evolution is real!"

i gave an example of scientists providing results, as opposed to some child molester holding up a dusty book of magic tricks



im sure you would agree that that treatment >> praying.

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

i gave an example of scientists providing results, as opposed to some child molester holding up a dusty book of magic tricks



im sure you would agree that that treatment >> praying.

you have faith in your beliefs just like everyone else

 

[Mr. Somebody]

i think creationists are, yes, a significant force driving the anti-stem cell research. as are all people who think that they know what god wants, when in fact, they dont because he has never spoken to them. they regurgitate books and stories written by men and pass them off as infallible knowledge

am i for people walking again? yes

are you a troll who was banned from sohh for consistent fakkitry? yes

You create a lot of troll threads. Get your mind together. Eventually stem cell research will be legalized but you'll still complain because you are a thought cop, and a demon. Its so demonic, friend.

 

[stealthbomber]

you have faith in your beliefs just like everyone else

theres a difference between scientifically proven results and beliefs.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Link?

Here's one (of literally hundreds).......

Transcript: Rowan Williams interview | World news | guardian.co.uk

AR: Are you comfortable with teaching creationism?

AC: Ahh, not very. Not very. I think creationism is, in a sense, a kind of category mistake, as if the Bible were a theory like other theories. Whatever the biblical account of creation is, it's not a theory alongside theories. It's not as if the writer of Genesis or whatever sat down and said well, how am I going to explain all this.... I know ' In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. And for most of the history of Christianity, and I think this is fair enough, most of the history of Christianity there's been an awareness that a belief that everything depends on the creative act of God, is quite compatible with a degree of uncertainty or latitude about how precisely that unfolds in creative time. You find someone like St. Augustine, absolutely clear God created everything, he takes Genesis fairly literally. But he then says well, what is it that provides the potentiality of change in the world? Well, hence, we have to think, he says, of - as when developing structures in the world, the seeds of potential in the world that drive processes of change. And some Christians responding to Darwin in the 19th Century said well, that sounds a bit like what St. Augustine said of the seeds of processes. So if creationism is presented as a stark alternative theory alongside other theories, I think there's - there's just been a jar of categories, it's not what it's about. And it - it reinforces the sense that...

AR: So it shouldn't be taught?

AC: I don't think it should, actually. No, no. And that's different from saying - different from discussing, teaching about what creation means. For that matter, it's not even the same as saying that Darwinism is - is the only thing that ought to be taught. My worry is creationism can end up reducing the doctrine of creation rather than enhancing it.


~Dr. Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury in an interview with Alan Rusbridger

 

[Dirty_Jerz]

theres a difference between scientifically proven results and beliefs.

your so right friend i completely agree with that


here is your chance to prove to everyone if you feel you must


show me an animal morphing into a different animal and not a sub species through artificial selection

full bone structures of animal species A - B transitional forms again all bones intact or peices collected and placed together no computer drawn estimates - C Completely new species with different size shape color brain size (advantages disadvantages) modes of travel ecosystem switches (Ex. swimming under the sea parasite/fish - climbing mountains herbivore) again full bone structure and how this is possible through climate change over time

Spoiler

bonus points show us how male or female came first through evolution and how long(years) it took for one to evolve before the other or how they both spontaneously came to be and evolve at the same time and how asexual creatures transformed into male and female and how long this took(years) or how they all were birthed into the world at the same time along with what species they were

if you dont want to do this dont reply

 

[daze23]

show me an animal morphing into a different animal and not a sub species through artificial selection

full bone structures of animal species A - B transitional forms again all bones intact or peices collected and placed together no computer drawn estimates - C Completely new species with different size shape color brain size (advantages disadvantages) modes of travel ecosystem switches (Ex. swimming under the sea parasite/fish - climbing mountains herbivore) again full bone structure and how this is possible through climate change over time

I'm not sure where you're setting the bar, but here ya go....