The difference between those two is that Elliott is a better blocker, a better pass catcher, and he makes defenders miss. Henry would be good once he gets in the open field. He just has to get in the open field. Put it this way, I have confidence that Elliott can succeed in 8 to 9 man fronts in the NFL. I have my doubts Henry can succeed in that same situation. But I do get what you're saying.
that's cool, i see what you saying, just think henry will be the better rb in the league...you have doubts about henry against 8/9 fronts? lol...i dont cause that's what he actually faced in college, unlike elliot...everyone knew bama was gonna run the ball, so they stuffed the box, and still couldnt stop him; where as elliot had the benefit of a good passing game....you talk about open field: what do you think henry would have gotten in dallas with a healthy line, romo, and dez?...nothing but open field....
dont get me wrong, i think elliot will be a good player in the league, but at that draft pick, i dont take him when ramsey is sitting right there to fill a need that is more pressing....and when you can draft good rbs later....
...hopefully elliot proves me wrong and does the damn thing...