Mad titty
Mad titty
Most of the "next-gen" games don't even look next genthis shyt ain't even NEXT GEN
You could tell from the trailers alone BOTW was a system seller. I only bought a Switch to play Zelda. So the Day 1 cop on March 2017: $399 + $59 = $458 + some tax resulted in around 1000 hours of blissful gameplay.Zelda BOTW was worth $70 to me. I'm still copping day 1.
This shyt is Pre-pre-gen tho.Most of the "next-gen" games don't even next gen
That's a good point. I'm guessing you feel the same about these cross platform games like horizon and gow rag that are 70 dollars on PS5 that are using the same engine and assests as the PS4 versions just upscaled.Because it's running on old hardware, and judging by the looks of it, the same engine and all that shyt. I'm sure the reused assets will be uber prevalant here, but glossed over by the stans.
+ no accessibility features, no pc version, no graphical or performance settings, limited voice acting, no actual new hardware features, etc.
Mad titty was complaining about sonys upgrade ‘tax’ because it didn’t include anything new and he’s sitting here justifying why somethign that released on the Wii U now deserves to be 10 more dollars
Finna finesse the fukk outta some coupons and keys, I can tell you thatand that bytch gon STAY $70
I used to wonder why Nintendo stopped trying to compete in graphics until after I spent a long time playing Breath of the Wild.Problem with paying games based off tech is that you have good looking games like cyberpunk that plays like shyt. Some of these developers pull magic out of old tech. Breath of the Wild was doing some shyt that current gen games weren't doing at the time, with their physics system.
I don't think it justifies $10 increase though.
Who cares? The obsession over technical shyt really fukked up gaming. Console gamers never really care about that shyt back in the day.Paying $70 for a game will likely run at 900p and 30 fps (with dips) is asking a lot, even if this game will likely be a GOTY contender.
Nintendo stay getting away with murder
they have a monopoly on the console handheld market (and let's not get it twisted, the Switch is primarily a handheld).
this shyt ain't even NEXT GEN
Most of the "next-gen" games don't even look next gen
Also, im not sure why we’re assuming this only applies to zelda. The idea of nintendo increasing prices in general with no new hardware is absurd.
Who’s paying 70 dollars for pikmin 4?
It’s a combination of Zelda’s physics system, sound and freedom of play that has saved many players lives from suicide and depression. When a game is such a masterpiece that it’s literally saving people’s lives, then all of its haters sound like they worship Satan and going straight to Hell.
Yall kill me bringing up old ass prices that your parents paid for if you really wanna keep it 100Y'all got short term memory or weren't there
In 1997 prices that's way worse than today.
You weren't mad about GOWR because you didn't pay $70 to play it on PS4, the "iNdUsTry StAndArD pRiCE!". Current gen games are $70, not last gen games. Switch is last gen and to boot is old as hell. If Sony raised the price of PS4 games you'd have a point.That's a good point. I'm guessing you feel the same about these cross platform games like horizon and gow rag that are 70 dollars on PS5 that are using the same engine and assests as the PS4 versions just upscaled.
You Sony Stan's were buying a game for 60 then paying 10 dollars for the next generation "upgrade" then paying 70 dollars a year later for the same game with ACTUAL next generation features.
This is a whole new Zelda game entry, coming out 6 years later, on Nintendo's "next-gen system", at current market prices that your lord and savior playstation cemented as the industry standard price point and you want to act like it's a big deal or a rip off. like you said breath of the wild is technically a Wii u title so this title is officially the switch debute Zelda game that is develop exclusively for the switch.
This game wouldn't be 70 bucks and neither would MS 1st party games if Sony had not shown the industry that it can charge $70 for cross-platform games as long it's a Triple A 1st party titles.
And that is what it is.
So no I wasn't mad about paying $70 for gow rag which was a cross platform game. A game built for the PS4...
Why would I complain or be mad about a Zelda game that isn't cross platform that is built for the switch and is charging the industry standard price?
Same people who pay 60 for sackboyAlso, im not sure why we’re assuming this only applies to zelda. The idea of nintendo increasing prices in general with no new hardware is absurd.
Who’s paying 70 dollars for pikmin 4?
The switch is a consoleNintendo stay getting away with murder because they have a monopoly on the console handheld market (and let's not get it twisted, the Switch is primarily a handheld).
900p 30fps in 2023 for 70 dollars is a little ridiculous tho.Who cares? The obsession over technical shyt really fukked up gaming. Console gamers never really care about that shyt back in the day.
I paid 70 to play a upscaled version of a last generation game breh breh.You weren't mad about GOWR because you didn't pay $70 to play it on PS4, the "iNdUsTry StAndArD pRiCE!". Current gen games are $70, not last gen games. Switch is last gen and to boot is old as hell. If Sony raised the price of PS4 games you'd have a point.