Halo and Forza could easily have been 70 out the gate.
Time is relative. But tech isn't.I have no dog in this fight but just out of curiosity...given that most people here who played BOTW spend upwards of 80-100+ hours playing the game, is a $10 increase in price that big of a deal? It's definitely worth it from a time perspective and I'd imagine there will be DLC or some type of expansion again too.
Bad news Nintendo thread: 100+ replies
Good news Nintendo thread: **crickets**
See above postHalo Infinite flopped at that shyt was free on gamepass
Day fukking 1…Zelda like cocaine to me, helluva experienceAnd im still going to buy it
Because it's running on old hardware, and judging by the looks of it, the same engine and all that shyt. I'm sure the reused assets will be uber prevalant here, but glossed over by the stans.Y'all wild, if it's about tech then MS games should be 100 bucks. Since it's about the tech...
How do you know botw2 didn't cost as much or more to make as your favorite triple A games on either system
Simple you don't
Because it's running on old hardware, and judging by the looks of it, the same engine and all that shyt. I'm sure the reused assets will be uber prevalant here, but glossed over by the stans.
Paying $70 for a game will likely run at 900p and 30 fps (with dips) is asking a lot, even if this game will likely be a GOTY contender.