CoD Advanced Warfare Official Thread
- Thread starter BasedPrime
- Start date
I play free for all
The way you made it sound was that it was easy
In every other cod i got double and triple kills every game like it was nothing
Now it doesn't register it the same
The Infamous
Superstar
Is this for camo unlocks?
Fury616
www.illdust.com
The Infamous
Superstar
Activision has no reason to do a beta for COD. They know COD is going to sell, why risk potential sales with a beta. People play the game, don't like it and end up not buying it.
The Infamous
Superstar
haha fukk all that...they can keep them zombie skins
I think if you have a friend that has the map unlocked [Riot], you can join their game and get the skin in about 20 minutes. This is what my friend told me.
The Infamous
Superstar
I feel you, a beta would be great.
About sales, it's still doing pretty well:
http://charlieintel.com/2014/11/10/...-wolfenstein-week-1-sales-combined-in-the-uk/
The Infamous
Superstar
5th fastest compared to other CODs
Optic and Faze are partially known for sniping/quick scoping. They have had one or two guys in competitive matches equipped with sniper rifles on occasion. I just saw Optic Scump sniping in an MLG match. Faze Pamaj announced on YouTube that they were bringing a sniping team to MLG Anaheim 2013. They mostly cover a spot and hard scope but they will quick scope if someone rushes them or while they're on the move.MW3 had 3 guns
? Nadeshot had a thermal LSW (just watched it on YouTube), I've seen a sniper rifle, FAD, and P90. This video shows the Ump was used heavy, and scanning real quick I saw an M4A1 :If anything BO2 and MW3 are practically even pro wise. Public matches MW3 got that.
You saying they never played 3v3? You never heard of Game Battles? A lot of pros started there and yes they have a 3v3 tourney.No, I don't want pro gamers participating in game design. We all played for countless hours but that doesn't mean we know shyt about design. Beta testing would be more effective. Pros are too small of a segment and there's nothing they can say that we can't.
The Infamous
Superstar
MW3 had 3 guns
If anything BO2 and MW3 are practically even pro wise. Public matches MW3 got that.
No, I don't want pro gamers participating in game design. We all played for countless hours but that doesn't mean we know shyt about design. Beta testing would be more effective. Pros are too small of a segment and there's nothing they can say that we can't.
- I know, Faze and Optic are known originally because of their sniping team. My point was, their competitive team have absolutely nothing to do with their sniping team.
- Yes, a few players on Optic snipe occasionally on SnD, but so do some players from all competitive teams.
- If they did bring a sniping team to MLG Anaheim it would be purely for fun because they would get smashed by every pro team and most amateur teams.
- Breh, you truly are confused. You posted a video of MW3 COD XP 2011 which took place 2 months before MW3 came out. You know why they used the UMP? Because when the tourney took place they didn't know which guns were good, so they based their decision on which guns were good in MW2. That is why you see pretty much all of them using either the UMP or the Scar. Both of which were good guns in MW2. The pros went into COD XP 2011 barely knowing anything about the game.
- Watch any tourney after the game's release and all you'll see is the ACR, MP7 and PP90. Type in 'MW3 MLG' in the youtube search bar and all you'll see is videos of pros using the above-mentioned 3 weapons.
- BO2 is easily better than MW3.
- Yes, game battles do have 3v3, but they also have 2v2, 1v1, and 4v4. Amongst the pros, 4v4 is by far the most commonly played.
- MLG pros study the game very thoroughly. For most of them, COD is their life. They understand weapons, spawns, perks, anything about the game. I would take their opinion/input over the average Joe that plays COD. I'm not saying their opinion is the be all and end all of COD, but it's damn important.