Piff Perkins
Veteran
I'm not opposed to Trump's people being on news shows to debate. The problem is that it's never really a debate. It's a group of people saying insane shyt and then the media moderator asks "well, how do you respond to that?" We saw it in the VP debate too. Trump lies about the Minnesota abortion bill, which is currently law and easy to look up. Yet the moderator once again posed the question as "Trump said X about the bill you passed, how do you respond." Why not look at the fukking bill? How the fukk is that a question at a debate.
Of course they want him to win. They want those press conferences, they want a return to "resist" fukkery, they want the book deals and breathless coverage of every outrage. It boosts their ratings. Whereas the only network that would be boosted by Harris is Fox News. BTW remember all those Friday threads the Coli would have about "huge" breaking news stories in the New York times, Washington Post, etc about something Trump got caught doing? That shyt drove newspaper clicks and subscriptions. Now neither paper is getting attention. Of course they want a return of Trump, it helps them.
Of course they want him to win. They want those press conferences, they want a return to "resist" fukkery, they want the book deals and breathless coverage of every outrage. It boosts their ratings. Whereas the only network that would be boosted by Harris is Fox News. BTW remember all those Friday threads the Coli would have about "huge" breaking news stories in the New York times, Washington Post, etc about something Trump got caught doing? That shyt drove newspaper clicks and subscriptions. Now neither paper is getting attention. Of course they want a return of Trump, it helps them.
