Motherfukkers acting like Nolan filmed the movie using only supplies from Hobby Lobby.Jeez, Nolan used BOTH... I dunno why people are arguing over silly semantics. The overall POINT is that it wasn't done in any kind of CG. It was all by practical effects.
Might go see it tomorrow
Is is worth the matinee brehs?
Nolan really the Lebron of this shyt. Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. Everyone whined some of his movies had way too much dialogue and exposition, and now ya'll complaining not enough dialogueI just saw it in XD.
I don't know why it's getting praised the way it is.
The storyline was non-existent, there was barely any dialogue, the visuals and the sound were great but it was just all right IMO.
I only saw it because of the praise and because it's Nolan.
Tom Hardy
George
I didn't complain.Nolan really the Lebron of this shyt. Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. Everyone whined some of his movies had way too much dialogue and exposition, and now ya'll complaining not enough dialogue
:smugnolan:
I didn't complain.
I just said there wasn't any dialogue.
There was barely a story
Idk...just more.The movie is about the evacuation and rescue from Dunkirk. What kind of exposition you expect???
Idk...just more.
I am conflicted.
I can't rate it yet.
Still digesting it.
It wasn't trash.
It wasn't amazing.
It was....idk...cant rate it lol
:nolan:DUMB KIRK was trash.
The Sound was great!:nolan:
Was this in a theater?Just finished the movie. It was alright. I'm a huge history buff, in particular World War 2 and the Vietnam War, so I was was excited about the movie. It's a decent movie but it's not something I'll buy on DVD/Blu Ray or rent but if it comes on FX, USA, etc. on a Saturday or Sunday I'll watch.