Right.... so you initially said it lacks imagination yet in the next breath you're saying it delves into concepts beyond any existing theory. That's pretty much showing imagination, albeit in a faux-Spielberg type of way.I was mostly referring to the final act, which delves into concepts beyond any existing theory. For the rest of the space stuff, this approach works because it is based on existing concepts and ideas. The same basically goes for 2001 which is largely about space exploration based on existing concepts and one act delving into the complete unknown.
I think this complaint only counts for the second half of the movie
after the kids become adults and it's all about Murph to the point you can wonder why they put Cooper's son (whose name I can't even remember) in the movie in the first place, because nothing he does matters and there's not even a conclusion to his character. Then you've got Brand's big speech about the power of love which definitely feels heavy handed but I thought at least fit the overall message the movie tried to convey, and Mann's actions which I've already said was the point where the movie started to lose it.
All the first act stuff though with Cooper trying to raise his children in a world where hope has died and his beliefs making him a 'man out of time' was perfect to me though. I can't see anyone finding fault in that stuff.
I can't really disagree with you there, however that's only the first act - which is only 45 minutes. When we hear '4,3,2,1' that's when all these relationships that the film planted go out the window. I feel as though, the acting carried the interactions throughout the first act, not the dialogue and script. The time that he tells Murph he's leaving and when he leaves, feels like its paced too fast. You don't manage to get a bearing of where both of them sit and he's gone.... which is mostly down to the film's time constraints, but the relationships never feel full and realized. And by the time we get into the second act, the interactions are so baseless they verge on being comedic. Then that Thomas' villanelle uttered over and over doesn't work, the humor doesn't work (oddly enough only the moments with TARS do), really the only dialogue that works, is the commentary of theory, which I think was great and not too 'let's see how far I can go over your head'. That spiel about the transcendence of love was beyond drop-my-head-and-shake-profusely status... Nolan couldn't make the females any more emotion-over-logic driven if he tried..... like why the fukk did he carry that daddy issues symptom throughout the entire second act, it ruined a natural growth of their father/daughter bond..... Murph had what two-three decades of practicing astrophysics and half-knowing why her pops had to leave..... yet this bytch took like 20 years to make her first video (probably because they didn't wanna add a teenage lookalike or make Chastain look young enough), and was still holding that shyt against Cooper... I can understand some bitterness towards him, but her anger and childish antics were just as strong as they were when she was an adolescent. Then the film's build alluded to her brother as if he was some psychopathic murderer-type dude.... that whole scene prior to her encounter with her pops while he was in the fifth dimension, and the tension that Nolan built, while she was trying to find an answer in her room and Getty waiting outside trying to tell her to hurry up because her brother was about to come back..... was beyond pointless. All the women were weak as fukk in the film. Murph, Brand, Cooper's daughter-in-law, even those extras around town looked mad vulnerable and had turtle-in-its-shell gait. Do Cooper and Brand ever build enough rapport or realistic friction that highlights the scale and despair of the situation.... i mean that relationship was pretty thin.
That whole scene where Mann's character does a 180 +his fight with Cooper was
That whole scene where Mann's character does a 180 +his fight with Cooper was
Wait, what..... so at the top you he goes into concepts beyond any existing theory (going into fantasy) and now you're saying that he doesn't extend beyond theory to the point where he goes into fantasy?I can't criticize the height of the film's vision, I can criticize that Nolan isn't quite up to par to reach those heights. Its vision is only too big for its own good because Nolan's vision doesn't extend beyond the point where theory becomes fantasy.
Last edited: