Why explain yourself to this close minded freaks.Yeah. And there's a big difference between a house becoming a junkyard and a house becoming a work of art.
Why explain yourself to this close minded freaks.Yeah. And there's a big difference between a house becoming a junkyard and a house becoming a work of art.
I see your point but when you live in one of those ritzy ass Southern Cal neighborhoods, it becomes a lot harder for property values to drop
I see your point but when you live in one of those ritzy ass Southern Cal neighborhoods, it becomes a lot harder for property values to drop
Yeah. And there's a big difference between a house becoming a junkyard and a house becoming a work of art.
Yeah I understand that. And what I'm saying is that it has less to do with "property value", and more to do with the fact that people like to impose their own will on others. I could understand keeping the grass cut and the yard clean, but forcing people to use the colors/decorations you see fit is just some selfish entitlement stuff that people get away with cause they have a lot of money.
Ever heard the saying ones man trash is another mans treasure?
My point is that its an inconsiderate thing to do. He can still do it if it's not breaking no zoning/Housing laws at his discretion....but it's basically a big fukk you to his neighbors, so how the fukk do you expect them to act?
A few towns over from me theirs some lady who fills her entire yards with painted law gnome thingy's, I'm talking fukking THOUSANDS of them.
She's been in the paper with neighbors trying to sue her in small claims court over the way that shyt looks and how they cant sell their house cuz no one wants to live next to the gnome lady.
One advantage of living out here in the country is that you don't have to deal with those HOA rules and shyt
Like I said. He lives in a HOA regulated community. So there are guidelines on the outer appearance of the homes in that neighborhood.
Has nothing to do with "selfish entitlement" as you mentioned.
I'd be damn If I can paint my whole house like the Louis Vuitton logo (dumb nikka shyt) and get away with it. HOA would be ridin my ass all day and take me the court.
Ever heard the saying ones man trash is another mans treasure?
That would be relevant if the "art" was relevant to the neighborhood.
At the end of the day certain neighborhoods attract certain buyers. Period.
This graffiti would be negligible (and might even appreciate) to property value if he lived in an artsy or trendy neighborhood. Like soho/williamsburg in NY for example. Because the type of people that look to buy in that area ARE THE TYPE THAT LIKE ART/GRAFFITI.
This seems like a neighborhood where you got upper class golden retriever and kids that go to private school types.
Hence, if someone comes to buy, they see graffiti, they go = LESS DEMAND.
Less demand = less value.
You people are just arguing just to argue. This is business. A business where supply and demand dictates price. In a front lawn birds chirping neighborhood, those people and the potential buyers do not like graffiti, its that simple.
Until Section 8 moves in and drags the entire neighborhood down. I'll keep my HOA.
Chris brown lives there and he likes graffiti. Obviously there is a market for people who like graffiti in that area. It attracts a different type of person than the other homeowners want around so they don't like it.
It's selfish entitlement like I said. These people inherited their sense of entitlement so HOA laws are created with the sole intention of keeping the status quo.