Chris Brown Angers Neighbors by covering his LA Home in Graffiiti (WSHH)

L&HH

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
53,123
Reputation
5,780
Daps
161,373
Reppin
PG x MD
:skip: Do some of yall read through the threads or just skim through it?

After a certain point damn near every post was the SAME thing. "you can tell who the homeowners are...property value decreases....." :heh:.

Anyways yall "boy who cried wolf" nikkas need to stop pulling the race card at every issue involving black/white ppl. It's more a generational divide if anything. Mac Miller (whose white) lives in a similar type neighborhood and faces similar issues regarding his neighbors approval of him (mainly noise complaints when he's in his studio, which should be soundproof).

I liked one of the posters resolution to this. There's enough of these young entertainers that maybe they should live in artsy neighborhoods together where they share similar interests and there wont be issues of noise complaints, graffiti on your house, how fast you drive down the street and things of that nature. :manny:
 

Ricky Church

Stole Timberlake's Spaceship-Coupe
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
35,567
Reputation
10,357
Daps
87,832
Reppin
Hudson County N.J. [Jersey City 201]
tacky or not, it's his money his home and his cars. he can do what the hell he wants with his property.

he's a young celebrity with millions of dollars, why the hell wouldn't he wanna live and have fun and enjoy his money?

just CACS acting up again :childplease:
 

GMOGMediaTV

GMOGMedia.tv
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
1,773
Reputation
200
Daps
2,029
Reppin
Miami
If his grafitti is against the HOA rules/regulations, then obviously he is in the wrong. If not then be should be able to pint his house however he wants to.

And yes most HOA rules are direct results of "selfish entitlement"

Rules are rules period. If you don't follow the rules then everything that applies to your logic is "selfish entitlement"

Also you are still stuck on the 'Graffti' thing.

It has nothing to do with the actual Graffiti itself but the 'change' to the outer appearance of his home that didn't follow the HOA guidelines.

It could've been as innocuous as him buying a row of Azalea flowers and placing it outside his porch.

If he didn't get pre-approval from the HOA before he bought an placed that shyt outside his home then he is in the wrong.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,045
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,833
Reppin
Tha Land
:snoop: So youre suggesting there is a market for the type who likes edgy property, in HOLLYWOOD HILLS:russ:

Im not even going to bother anymore:laff:

:usure: if Chris brown moved there, why wouldn't other "Chris brown" types consider moving there?

If it wasn't the type of neighborhood to attract a person that like graffiti, Chris brown wouldn't be living there
 

King Poetic

Sagittarius AllSeason
Supporter
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
96,559
Reputation
18,644
Daps
470,405
Reppin
Los Angeles County, California
Brown is not the first celebrity to ruffle neighborhood feathers. Not far away, Madonna drew protests in the 1990s when she painted her Hollywood Hills home in red and yellow stripes.

Residents pulled the welcome mat from Lindsay Lohan over an endless procession of paparazzi and others speeding on her street. Justin Bieber's neighbors in Calabasas complain his entourage regularly races through the suburban gated community.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it's not about race it's the fact that these people will have to live there the rest of there lives while chris brown and other celebrities can pick up and move when they decide they don't want to live there no more.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,045
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,833
Reppin
Tha Land
Rules are rules period. If you don't follow the rules then everything that applies to your logic is "selfish entitlement"

Also you are still stuck on the 'Graffti' thing.

It has nothing to do with the actual Graffiti itself but the 'change' to the outer appearance of his home that didn't follow the HOA guidelines.

It could've been as innocuous as him buying a row of Azalea flowers and placing it outside his porch.

If he didn't get pre-approval from the HOA before he bought an placed that shyt outside his home then he is in the wrong.

Like I said. I understand HOA rules have to be followed. If he signed a contract stating what he could/can't do to his home then he has to follow those rules.

What I'm saying is in most situations those rules are made to keep the status quo in a neighborhood. Not to protect property values.
 
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
8,291
Reputation
3,075
Daps
23,124
If it wasn't the type of neighborhood to attract a person that like graffiti, Chris brown wouldn't be living there

NO. Chris Brown lives there because he is rich and wanted a mansion. Graffiti was not the factor that attracted him there. Because there is no graffiti/rustic elements in that neighborhood.

He is rich and likes mansions, that is the factor that puts him in line with everybody else in that neighborhood, hence moving into the neighborhood.

Sit back for a moment and think about what youre saying.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
69,045
Reputation
3,719
Daps
108,833
Reppin
Tha Land

NO. Chris Brown lives there because he is rich and wanted a mansion. Graffiti was not the factor that attracted him there. Because there is no graffiti/rustic elements in that neighborhood.

He is rich and likes mansions, that is the factor that puts him in line with everybody else in that neighborhood, hence moving into the neighborhood.


Sit back for a moment and think about what youre saying.

And there are other rich people who like mansions AND graffiti. There are also rich people who want to live near celebrities. There are also rich women who would love to live next door to Chris brown.

If the neighborhood can attract one rich dude who likes graffiti then it can attract more rich dudes that like graffiti.

Like I said people want to preserve the status quo, not their property values.
 

RAX 010

NYG LWO METS
Supporter
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
21,324
Reputation
4,908
Daps
43,459
Reppin
EAST✈WEST
Let's keep it real, if someone buys a house and they get in the position where they can no longer pay the mortgage, they deserve to be foreclosed on. Doesn't matter if it's an a$$hole or a sweet old lady behind the situation. It's unfortunate, but the bank doesn't owe them sympathy.

This is tacky on Chris Brown's behalf and a waste of money. Now he's going to have to pay fines for having shyt graffiti on the side of his home. Probably not a lot in the grand scheme but it's money nonetheless. Why no live in an artsy neighborhood where houses are "different" and allow things like that.

You gotta ruffle up some feathers every once in a while playboy

:birdman:
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Messages
1,017
Reputation
-50
Daps
443
crazy how reg white folks working at payless can just live in Chris Browns neighborhoods but we gotta sell millions of albums to be able to live in a home like that.


9 outta 10 people who have wealth like that inherited it, Brown is probably the only person in that neighborhood who achieved it from the bottom up.


Honestly, as long as he has nothing racially offensive/hate images on his property he has a right to do whatever he wants with it IMO.


I'm not a big Chris Brown fan but support whatever makes those cacs mad

Guess what whites will continue to pass the money down generation to generation. While Chris will blow it on bullshyt. If Chris has a son he will prob be absent in his life anyway so it wont matter about the money since the kid will just be another no father ass dude. Chris will be broke in his 50's
 
Top