Chicago Gets Ready For Crime To Plummet: Considers Concealed Carry

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
18,951
Reputation
4,450
Daps
79,075
Reppin
North Jersey
Imagine upstanding citizens gettin word of killings goin on in a rough chicago hood and they all travel to the hood 30 deep in 5 armored vans and post up on the block, armed, lookin like:birdman: and they look at the wastes of life like "not in OUR neighborhood, or ANY neighborhood:ufdup:"


:blessed:
Sounds like an ethnic cleansing:lupe:
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,623
Reputation
13,643
Daps
244,490
Why doesn't Chicago do whatever the fukk NYC did to go from dangerous to safe?

Increased police presence and police shooting a lot of civilians. In 2001 cops shot more civilians then civilians shot one another in NYC.
 

Mr. Negative

Conspiracy Weirdo
Supporter
Joined
Aug 10, 2012
Messages
28,741
Reputation
8,147
Daps
80,887
Reppin
A Mississippi Cotton Field
Americans are crazy...The solution to violence is more guns...?

Hahahaha...

More people will die...

Let the f_ckery begin...


I'll kill a million worthless wannabe thug rapper Wire watching motherfukkers if it means a block of citizens get to sit on the stoop in peace, walk to the corner store safe, play outside, walk to school with no problem, etc.


What would YOUR solution be?

Generic shyt like build more schools?

Build rec rooms so kids can occupy themselves and not be on the street?

Show them culture is cool?

Walk them through some magical Utopian Brainwashing Machine?
 

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
22,151
Reputation
4,265
Daps
56,948
Reppin
Run Thru U Like Skattebo
increased gun ownership may reduce home invasions and stick ups, but drive bys and other random shootings probably wont be impacted.

gang assassination attempts that get innocent people caught up are not going to be prevented by knowing some people are carrying, the gangster thinks he is shooting at other gangsters who are likely armed, and they do it anyway because they have the element of surprise. unless the shooter is terrible, no armed victim is going to be able to even use his gun in self defense.

they are going to have to solve chicago's gang problem directly somehow, but i dont oppose this measure, chicago cant get any worse anyway
 

samtalksradio

Banned
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
2,765
Reputation
-1,640
Daps
5,093
Reppin
Belle Glade FL
it's about time Chicago done woke up I don't understand why people believe that having there guns taking will protect them when it's clear that the criminals don't follow the law now hopefully the law abiding citizen in Chicago can get there concealed carry asap to protect themselves from these hoodlums.
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
39,523
Reputation
1,554
Daps
37,703
Reppin
NULL
increased gun ownership may reduce home invasions and stick ups, but drive bys and other random shootings probably wont be impacted.

gang assassination attempts that get innocent people caught up are not going to be prevented by knowing some people are carrying, the gangster thinks he is shooting at other gangsters who are likely armed, and they do it anyway because they have the element of surprise. unless the shooter is terrible, no armed victim is going to be able to even use his gun in self defense.

they are going to have to solve chicago's gang problem directly somehow, but i dont oppose this measure, chicago cant get any worse anyway
This is the issue. This will not stop crime on the sidewalk. Nanoseconds to react during someone pulling up and pulling out the tec 9 :upsetfavre:
 

ExodusNirvana

Change is inevitable...
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
41,107
Reputation
9,172
Daps
150,439
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
What I dont understand in the pro gun debate is, how are you going to protect yourself if someone has a gun pointed in your face? Do you think they are going to give you time to pull your gun out? If I were a criminal and thought someone might be carrying a concealed gun I would wait to pull my gun out until I was right in your face so you wouldnt have time to react or I would simply shoot you and kill you before I robbed you rather than just intimidating you and making you empty your pockets.

Yup

Gonna be like NYC in the late 80s...just pop you and that's it
 

Mowgli

Veteran
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
103,623
Reputation
13,643
Daps
244,490
increased gun ownership may reduce home invasions and stick ups, but drive bys and other random shootings probably wont be impacted.

gang assassination attempts that get innocent people caught up are not going to be prevented by knowing some people are carrying, the gangster thinks he is shooting at other gangsters who are likely armed, and they do it anyway because they have the element of surprise. unless the shooter is terrible, no armed victim is going to be able to even use his gun in self defense.

they are going to have to solve chicago's gang problem directly somehow, but i dont oppose this measure, chicago cant get any worse anyway

As long as the criminals keep killing each other, stop breaking in homes and shooting in public where families are around, its all good. Eventually, after enough people die, a power vaccum will be filled and gangs can do their operations in peace. Right now it seems that Chicago gangs have no structure or proper leadership so we have to wait for the kids to get older and become more disciplined in how they organize their gangs. Until then, citizens need to be safe from their dealings and allowing them the right to carry that heat, will assist until that day comes.
 

NZA

LOL
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
22,151
Reputation
4,265
Daps
56,948
Reppin
Run Thru U Like Skattebo
As long as the criminals keep killing each other, stop breaking in homes and shooting in public where families are around, its all good. Eventually, after enough people die, a power vaccum will be filled and gangs can do their operations in peace. Right now it seems that Chicago gangs have no structure or proper leadership so we have to wait for the kids to get older and become more disciplined in how they organize their gangs. Until then, citizens need to be safe from their dealings and allowing them the right to carry that heat, will assist until that day comes.

another problem is that youth are not allowed to carry concealed pistols, yet it is the youth that are most at risk for random killings. the gangsters will know that teens are not legally packing.

the truth is, you cant shoot your way out of this problem. one problem as you mentioned is that the gangs lack the level of organization found in other cities, so you have lots of young gangsters with no clear territorial boundaries. that murdered girl who went to the inauguration was killed by a 19 year old gangster who had been shot in the arm a few months prior. he was in his own hood when it happened, and felt it was better to start shooting other teens first and asking questions later so his enemies would know he meant business, i guess. either way, conealed carry is not aimed at people under 21, and gangsters are paraonoid enough that they feel it is better to have a pre-emptive strike policy. concealed carry is useless for law abiding teens who are not standing on guard duty, prepared to start blasting immediately.

this really is not seeming like a solution once you really look at the demographics. we are talking largely about people who can never legally carry anyway, and will not be a part of whatever solution you think will happen.
 
Top