CEOS COULD EASILY BE REPLACED WITH AI, EXPERTS ARGUE

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,968
Reputation
6,947
Daps
146,452
Reppin
CookoutGang
what accountability do ceo's really have to us? most of it is to corporate and shareholders to be the "leader of direction" or the "fall guy"

hold the corporation accountable. the fall guy is a distraction and that's part of their job, taking heat or taking all the props.
They can be replaced. Negotiated with. They’re human.

You’re suggesting a black box the board can use as cover for any and all decisions.

Imagine trying to hold AI accountable for why it made a decision that led to planes crashing without any way to actual track its logic because the algorithm’s not opaque and complexity of decision making can’t be neatly ascertained.

“Sorry, we must have had some bad training data.”
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
50,148
Reputation
-2,100
Daps
242,969
What’s stopping companies from using ai for it & software development?

Couldn’t all the people who work in IT be expendable?


Eventually,


Thats why people need to see we are in a window in time that if you can master this technology, or at the least develop the means to build it. You will do very well for yourself moving forward.
 

Amestafuu (Emeritus)

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
70,374
Reputation
13,842
Daps
298,530
Reppin
Toronto
They can be replaced. Negotiated with. They’re human.

You’re suggesting a black box the board can use as cover for any and all decisions.

Imagine trying to hold AI accountable for why it made a decision that led to planes crashing without any way to actual track its logic because the algorithm’s not opaque and complexity of decision making can’t be neatly ascertained.

“Sorry, we must have had some bad training data.”
clearly said hold the corporation accountable.

if there is no CEO and you are using AI the AI will NOT be taking the heat. there should be a board and the board should still have final say. NOBODY SAID THE AI should have FINAL SAY. it's not that hard to let it do the logic and let humans make final decision. a CEO is not a dictator anyway
 

Arizax2

All Star
Joined
Mar 20, 2017
Messages
3,321
Reputation
321
Daps
10,466
I think people fail to understand what a CEO of large companies actually do. Their main job is to make sure investors don't lose confidence in the company and grow the stock price of said company. Anyone that has grown through their company with several different CEOs can feel the cultural and strategic changes they make which can be seen and felt. Sure there's board of directors but a CEO is needed to be the figure head, agent of change and ultimately the fall guy if shyt hits the fan. Ai can replace alot of jobs but someone still needs to lead the way even if you decide to call the CEO something else.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,968
Reputation
6,947
Daps
146,452
Reppin
CookoutGang
clearly said hold the corporation accountable.

if there is no CEO and you are using AI the AI will NOT be taking the heat. there should be a board and the board should still have final say. NOBODY SAID THE AI should have FINAL SAY. it's not that hard to let it do the logic and let humans make final decision. a CEO is not a dictator anyway
You’ve undermined your entire argument completely.
 

tuckgod

The high exalted
Joined
Feb 4, 2016
Messages
47,810
Reputation
14,291
Daps
179,252
What’s stopping companies from using ai for it & software development?

Couldn’t all the people who work in IT be expendable?
Nothing is stopping them at all

That's what they've been using for awhile

Nothing codes better than chatgpt from what regular humans have access to

The only thing that will keep us working is if we make the AI companies stop development and that'll never happen

This is just AI on regular silicon

Wait til you see what that bytch can do in a quantum computer

8597102.jpg
 

Umoja

Veteran
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Messages
15,149
Reputation
3,270
Daps
104,725
Some of you have far too much faith in A.I.

1. The money saved would not to the employees. A chunk would go towards the licencing fee and the amount actually saved would go towards the company.

2. We are not at a point where A.I can replace someone's network and goodwill.
 
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
271
Reputation
20
Daps
522
I think people fail to understand what a CEO of large companies actually do. Their main job is to make sure investors don't lose confidence in the company and grow the stock price of said company. Anyone that has grown through their company with several different CEOs can feel the cultural and strategic changes they make which can be seen and felt. Sure there's board of directors but a CEO is needed to be the figure head, agent of change and ultimately the fall guy if shyt hits the fan. Ai can replace alot of jobs but someone still needs to lead the way even if you decide to call the CEO something else.
You have described a computer program.
 

Ezekiel 25:17

Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2018
Messages
33,187
Reputation
1,841
Daps
120,302
Moral of the story is that a CEO is easier to replace than a worker.

People still gotta cook the food.

They can ask AI about prices and menu options based on sales.


How many people have you personally met can run Amazon/Walmart/McDonald's?

And if they could run those 3, im assuming their current business is just as big?
 
Top