Prodigital
All Star
I'm going going, back to back, to Miami Miami 

Wilt's teams were not stacked like Boston. Not even close
and he was arguably the GOAT scorer - how can you just omit that? Russell couldnt score like Wilt
Well, you just made this one up, but OK![]()
Oh so now we're gonna go into semanticsMVP stands for "Most Valuable Player, " not best stats.
Oh so now we're gonna go into semantics
He wasn't the best player in his era.
Wilt is ahead in points, rebounds, assists and FG percentage. Russell shot 44% from the field. That's shaky for a shooting guard, let alone a center.
Russell played with four members of the NBA's Top 50 at 50 (Havlicek, Cousy, Sharman, and Sam Jones); Wilt played with six members (Baylor, West, Greer, Cunningham, Arizin, and Thurmond). And Russell's teammates from 1957 to 1969 were selected to twenty-six All-Star games, while Wilt's teammates from 1960 to 1973 were selected to twenty-four. Let's never mention the supporting-cast card again with Russell and Chamberlain. Thank you.
Look at the record when Russell faced Wilt. Whose team won more? Hint: the team led by the guy with 11 rings.
Russell got the better of Chamberlain in their head-to-head matchups.
Wilt played with Thurmond for Nate's rookie season and then headed to Philly next season
He played with West/Baylor at the end of his career and Elgin wasby then
The rest arent on the level of the rest of the names mentioned
If you are seriously trying to frame an argument where Wilt had equal talent next to him than Russell than just stop replying to me
and look at hwo you moved the goal posts on Wilt/Russell and how Russell always 'owned' him H2H - now its about wins? Seriously?![]()
Keep making shyt up
Wilt and Russell played against each other 142 times in 10 years. Russell's team won 88, Wilt's teams won 74. (14 game difference)
He wasn't the better rebounder and there were no stats for blocks that I'm aware of.Wilt was solely a better scorer than Russell.
Russell was a better rebounder, better shot blocker, better defender, and a better leader. Dude has 11 rings and 5 MVP awards. Let that sink in. That dynasty Celtics squad was built around him. He was undeniably the best player on that team. Prior to Russell, the Celtics never won anything, despite having the same team minus him. Russell was the best player in the 60s, full stop.
Russell got the better of Chamberlain in their head-to-head matchups.