Can pedophiles use the "born this way" argument?

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,368
Reputation
3,362
Daps
57,376
Real Talk. They keep trying to spin it, like i am defending pedophiles.

relax breh, give it about 30yrs from now, a little social conditioning through the media, a few CNN panels and discussions...they'll be ready to accept it.
All the while calling you an old fogey
 
Last edited:

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,295
Daps
7,987
Reppin
Dub-C
I'm not gay. I just don't care if the next man is and don't think they should be treated differently under the law because of it, especially when all the evidence indicates it causes no harm.

As for your actual argument, sex doesn't have to be directed towards producing children. We already know that. As for being abnormal, what they do is statistically abnormal (for humans- there are animal species in which all members are bisexual,) but that's it, and statistical abnormality doesn't mean something is bad unless it has proven negative effects. Why are you so mad, anyway?

yea but we are humans correct....we compare what bears do and say humans can do it to?
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,426
Reputation
275
Daps
6,206
yea but we are humans correct....we compare what bears do and say humans can do it to?

My perspective is... who cares if a particular behavior/desire is statistically abnormal? It's completely irrelevant. Some people choose to eat only fruits and vegetables. Sure, that's not the norm, as humans evolved as omnivores, but who gives a shyt? Does that make them deficient, or less of a person, or immoral people? No. They just have a different lifestyle. Different preference.
 

Digga38

The seperation between what's fake and what's real
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
8,601
Reputation
-1,295
Daps
7,987
Reppin
Dub-C
My perspective is... who cares if a particular behavior/desire is statistically abnormal? It's completely irrelevant. Some people choose to eat only fruits and vegetables. Sure, that's not the norm, as humans evolved as omnivores, but who gives a shyt? Does that make them deficient, or less of a person, or immoral people? No. They just have a different lifestyle. Different preference.


not when the lifestyle is artifically generated.....or you think this gay pop increase istrictly by chance?
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,426
Reputation
275
Daps
6,206
not when the lifestyle is artifically generated.....or you think this gay pop increase istrictly by chance?

Who says the population has risen? Just because there are more OPEN homosexuals doesn't mean there are more homosexuals in the general population.
 

KyokushinKarateMan

Train hard, fight easy
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
17,213
Reputation
-1,968
Daps
59,775
Reppin
U.S.
My perspective is... who cares if a particular behavior/desire is statistically abnormal? It's completely irrelevant. Some people choose to eat only fruits and vegetables. Sure, that's not the norm, as humans evolved as omnivores, but who gives a shyt? Does that make them deficient, or less of a person, or immoral people? No. They just have a different lifestyle. Different preference.


You and the rest of today's brain-dead lovers of 'pop logic' are going to learn a harsh lesson in life.
You will learn to let go of that "we are the world everyone may do as they please who cares, and if you do care they you're judging" sorry excuse for 'philosophy'.
It's merely the 'popular' way to think these days, in the 90s it was 'think outside the box' and everyone proceeded to utter that phrase for the next 5 years as their green light to indulge in any and all disgust. This form of thinking is baseless, empty, and illogical.
It takes a certain level of empty headedness and lack of ability to think for one's self to subscribe to such sorry excuse for 'logic' as what is popularly subscribed to today.
I mean no offense when I tell you that you sound like a complete mindless idiot trying to use a person's choice in diet as the analogical equivalent to homosexuality.
You were born with a brain. Use it.

I often too find that is the younger amongst us, the under 25 lollipop happy go lucky generation, who cling to 'todays pop-philosophies'. Grow up. Life and reality will teach you differently, better to get a head start by removing your head from the proverbial ass of Eurocentric ideals.
 

Fervid

Largest Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
2,005
Reputation
240
Daps
3,653
You and the rest of today's brain-dead lovers of 'pop logic' are going to learn a harsh lesson in life.
You will learn to let go of that "we are the world everyone may do as they please who cares, and if you do care they you're judging" sorry excuse for 'philosophy'.
It's merely the 'popular' way to think these days, in the 90s it was 'think outside the box' and everyone proceeded to utter that phrase for the next 5 years as their green light to indulge in any and all disgust. This form of thinking is baseless, empty, and illogical.
It takes a certain level of empty headedness and lack of ability to think for one's self to subscribe to such sorry excuse for 'logic' as what is popularly subscribed to today.
I mean no offense when I tell you that you sound like a complete mindless idiot trying to use a person's choice in diet as the analogical equivalent to homosexuality.
You were born with a brain. Use it.

I often too find that is the younger amongst us, the under 25 lollipop happy go lucky generation, who cling to 'todays pop-philosophies'. Grow up. Life and reality will teach you differently, better to get a head start by removing your head from the proverbial ass of Eurocentric ideals.
Pot calling a kettle black? ^^^All of this :trash:
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
You and the rest of today's brain-dead lovers of 'pop logic' are going to learn a harsh lesson in life.
You will learn to let go of that "we are the world everyone may do as they please who cares, and if you do care they you're judging" sorry excuse for 'philosophy'.
It's merely the 'popular' way to think these days, in the 90s it was 'think outside the box' and everyone proceeded to utter that phrase for the next 5 years as their green light to indulge in any and all disgust. This form of thinking is baseless, empty, and illogical.
It takes a certain level of empty headedness and lack of ability to think for one's self to subscribe to such sorry excuse for 'logic' as what is popularly subscribed to today.
I mean no offense when I tell you that you sound like a complete mindless idiot trying to use a person's choice in diet as the analogical equivalent to homosexuality.
You were born with a brain. Use it.

I often too find that is the younger amongst us, the under 25 lollipop happy go lucky generation, who cling to 'todays pop-philosophies'. Grow up. Life and reality will teach you differently, better to get a head start by removing your head from the proverbial ass of Eurocentric ideals.

You've said a whole lot of nothing. What exactly is the "harsh lesson" that "life and reality" is going to teach us about gays?
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,426
Reputation
275
Daps
6,206
You and the rest of today's brain-dead lovers of 'pop logic' are going to learn a harsh lesson in life.
You will learn to let go of that "we are the world everyone may do as they please who cares, and if you do care they you're judging" sorry excuse for 'philosophy'.
It's merely the 'popular' way to think these days, in the 90s it was 'think outside the box' and everyone proceeded to utter that phrase for the next 5 years as their green light to indulge in any and all disgust. This form of thinking is baseless, empty, and illogical.
It takes a certain level of empty headedness and lack of ability to think for one's self to subscribe to such sorry excuse for 'logic' as what is popularly subscribed to today.
I mean no offense when I tell you that you sound like a complete mindless idiot trying to use a person's choice in diet as the analogical equivalent to homosexuality.
You were born with a brain. Use it.

I often too find that is the younger amongst us, the under 25 lollipop happy go lucky generation, who cling to 'todays pop-philosophies'. Grow up. Life and reality will teach you differently, better to get a head start by removing your head from the proverbial ass of Eurocentric ideals.

You did nothing to dispute my point, or show how my analogy fails... you only call me names, and accused me of having some sort of bandwagon mentality. Typical of HL, but completely wrong. You say I'm going to learn a harsh lesson .... How? Why? What in particular is wrong about allowing people to do as they wish, as long as it's not harming another person? But more importantly, people aren't becoming more accepting of homosexuality because it's the "popular thing to do" -- it's more complex than that. Personally, I think people are abandoning traditional ideas for reasoned thought.

It's folks like YOU who are going to learn a lesson. Gone are the days when saying X action is wrong because Y says so. People are more accepting of homosexuality because people are dropping that archaic train of thought, and are realizing there is no tangible harm in two adults of the same sex being attracted to each other. It's, in fact, YOUR philosophy that is baseless, and empty.

How about instead of telling me to grow-up, you actually present an argument as to why anything you think on this topic makes sense. Your entire post was completely asinine.
 

shhh-kull & bones

Judah have I loved, Esau have I hated! -GAWD
Joined
Sep 17, 2013
Messages
1,040
Reputation
-75
Daps
1,653
Reppin
BK, USA
If a man said he'd always been sexually attracted to children, how is that argument any different from the homosexual "born this way" argument? This is without any action on that attraction taking place.

Why is the pedophile called "sick" but the homosexual isn't?

I repeat, this is without any action taken place.

So does he have a mental condition, sick or "born this way"?

Explain it to me. Don't bring the "two consenting adults" argument because i'm talking about "born this way" sexual attraction.



lgbt+pedophiles+bestiality practitioners+jews+ignorant n-words = filthy psychotic shyt-bags:stopitslime:


no wonder the us economy is in the toilet...with those kinds of soulless degenerates running around it should only get worse


maybe its me brehs but it seems that US culture only produces useless degenerate shyt-bags and its really hardworking immigrants from other counties keeping it from falling completely...
just a thought:patrice:
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
50,968
Reputation
4,416
Daps
89,058
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Most pedophiles are homosexual.
GgptjvI.gif
 

The Real

Anti-Ignorance
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
6,353
Reputation
725
Daps
10,726
Reppin
NYC
Most pedophiles are homosexual.

That's actually not true. Most studies we have now suggest that the vast majority of pedophiles are "heterosexual" men, but more research is needed before we can give percentages of likelihood (which is what would be measured- most pedophiles will always be heterosexual because most people will always be heterosexual) with more accuracy.
 

KyokushinKarateMan

Train hard, fight easy
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
17,213
Reputation
-1,968
Daps
59,775
Reppin
U.S.
You did nothing to dispute my point, or show how my analogy fails... you only call me names, and accused me of having some sort of bandwagon mentality. Typical of HL, but completely wrong. You say I'm going to learn a harsh lesson .... How? Why? What in particular is wrong about allowing people to do as they wish, as long as it's not harming another person? But more importantly, people aren't becoming more accepting of homosexuality because it's the "popular thing to do" -- it's more complex than that. Personally, I think people are abandoning traditional ideas for reasoned thought.

It's folks like YOU who are going to learn a lesson. Gone are the days when saying X action is wrong because Y says so. People are more accepting of homosexuality because people are dropping that archaic train of thought, and are realizing there is no tangible harm in two adults of the same sex being attracted to each other. It's, in fact, YOUR philosophy that is baseless, and empty.

How about instead of telling me to grow-up, you actually present an argument as to why anything you think on this topic makes sense. Your entire post was completely asinine.

Go beg attention for your homo debate elsewhere. I am not your father. It is not my responsibility to 'prove' anything to you, and furthermore, the more you type the less inclined I am to put anymore effort into enlightening you. I am not sure what an HL is or why you feel the need to label me that, and to be honest I actually don't even care. What you call "archaic" thought is what's known by normal human beings as human nature, natural instinct, laws of nature.. let me guess, next you'll say "and who's to say what's a normal human being!".
I gave you the reasoning, it's your choice whether to continue to sink or to swim, not my responsibility to make you swim. Choose wisely.
 
Top