Can pedophiles use the "born this way" argument?

Dooby

إن شاء الله
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
8,383
Reputation
-411
Daps
10,408
So kid banging doesn't affect anyone? :comeon:

We have laws because we're a society of laws, we create rules to help govern the world and people around us, our WHOLE GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM is based on laws it's part and parcel with living in the USA. And really it's part in parcel with living with other people. Even cave men had rules (i'm sure) and my guess is there was always that one mutha fuker wanting to shyt right next to the food like :manny:

You can't say we have laws BECAUSE we're a society of laws your claim is baseless with such an ill arrangement of words. I should be able to do absolutely anything I want with my body, when I want, where I want and how I want to.
As for the people around me they have their own personal methods of retaliation if I end up encroaching on what they deem to be the line of of intolerable behavior.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
You can't say we have laws BECAUSE we're a society of laws your claim is baseless with such an ill arrangement of words. I should be able to do absolutely anything I want with my body, when I want, where I want and how I want to.
As for the people around me they have their own personal methods of retaliation if I end up encroaching on what they deem to be the line of of intolerable behavior.
why do we have laws then?
 

Dooby

إن شاء الله
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
8,383
Reputation
-411
Daps
10,408
why do we have laws then?

I'm saying we shouldn't. Just have a reactionary basis for someone's actions on an individual level.

For instance if a person slays another person and their entire family. What damage is done? Those people, and the people directly affected by the slaying are in fact, dead. They have no feelings or desires in death.
 
Last edited:

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
I'm saying we shouldn't. Just have a reactionary basis for someone's actions on an individual level.

For instance if a person slays another person and their entire family. What damage is done? Those people, and the people directly affected are by the slaying are in fact, dead. They have no feelings or desires in death.
So if i read that right we should have no laws...?
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
How many times do I have to repeat myself? YES. You're correct in your reading comprehension.
you sure. it's not often i see something so . . . stupid and not have someone want to correct their stupidity. I'm pretty sure there are countries where there are little to no laws. YOu should try one of them.
 

Dooby

إن شاء الله
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
8,383
Reputation
-411
Daps
10,408
you sure. it's not often i see something so . . . stupid and not have someone want to correct their stupidity. I'm pretty sure there are countries where there are little to no laws. YOu should try one of them.


Any opinion other than my own is a stupid one.

#HigherLearning
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,167
Reppin
The Deep State
I never said anyone was an abnormal queer. And you have not opened my eyes to anything scientific.

Nothing you've said really makes sense scientifically. It's just a bunch of stuff you read on the Internet from people defending homosexuality.



I also suggest you read up on literature regarding:

http://www.jneurosci.org/content/22/3/1027.long

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stria_terminalis#Bed_nucleus_of_the_stria_terminalis_.28BNST.29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,167
Reppin
The Deep State

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,167
Reppin
The Deep State
Think about it breh, rampant ANAL SEX in a time without condoms, all that disease carried from one to another. They weren't doing enemas, so they were literally passing feces from one to another. And people like @The Real will mention studies to justify this :mindblown: The traditional family structure destroyed, rampant disease and people actually support this :beli: I know for a fact people in West Africa weren't engaging in this madness.

1. Anal sex is dangerous only because of the propensity to tear tissue, not because its more prone to viral transmission. Vaginal sex still gives you all the other famous STDs.

2. Are you saying West Africans weren't having gay sex because it was outlawed/not allowed or because there were no gays? :usure: Are you sure of this? Because homosexuality is illegal in more than half of the world, but it doesn't mean there aren't any gay people.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,167
Reppin
The Deep State
OP: Ultimately. Society makes the rules it wants to follow.

I'm cool with adults having consensual sex with one another, no matter how kinky or "unproductive" of children it may be.

I'm not cool with adults having sex with children under the age of (whatever the state says).
 
Top