Can DC movies survive Superman vs Batman Underperforming?

[Saysumthinfunnymike]

Amazing Spider-Man 2 did $708,000,000 worldwide.

X-Men: Days of Future Past did $748,000,000 worldwide.

Guardians of the Galaxy did $774,000,000 worldwide.

Transformers: Age of Extinction did $1,091,000,000 worldwide.

I have to think a movie with Batman and Superman will do very very well...

 

[Lord Piffington]

We can surmise this because Zack Snyder hasn't made anything good

watchmen breh?

 

[Amestafuu (Emeritus)]

i dont want to go thru another drought for superman movies

I'd be fine never seeing another simpaman movie

 

[TheGodling]

watchmen breh?

Everything good about Watchmen is because the source material is that good, everything bad about the movie is Snyder not getting the source material.

 

[Lord Piffington]

Everything good about Watchmen is because the source material is that good, everything bad about the movie is Snyder not getting the source material.

Yeah well he got like 70 years of source material now so have some faith

 

[TheGodling]

Yeah well he got like 70 years of source material now so have some faith

I have no faith that he gets most of that source material either. Man Of Steel already showed he doesn't get Superman or his appeal.

 

[Brandeezy]

Marvel stans think if it isn't a Marvel comic book movie then people won't go see it

Really think your average movie goer is gonna be like "No kids, DC's movies are pretty bad as of lately. I don't think we should go see it"

All they know is names and what they see in trailers. They see Batman in the title, right there is a ticket sold.

I think the movie well be dope based off the fact that WB threw David Goyer's original script in the bushes and got dude from Argo to rewrite it

 

[Dragonfly Jones]

If it's not at the very least better than the first Avengers movie then this is an L


but DC can only blame themselves, they been making Superman movies since the 1970s, Marvel just started making real superhero films in 2000 with Xmen (1998 if u count Blade)


DC had all the time in the world to surpass Marvel in this film sh1t but they're just lazy, gotta give props to Marvel for showing dudes how comic book films should be done tho

 

[Brandeezy]

If it's not at the very least better than the first Avengers movie then this is an L


but DC can only blame themselves, they been making Superman movies since the 1970s, Marvel just started making real superhero films in 2000 with Xmen (1998 if u count Blade)


DC had all the time in the world to surpass Marvel in this film sh1t but they're just lazy, gotta give props to Marvel for showing dudes how comic book films should be done tho

Marvel hasn't even made a better movie than TDK.

 

[loyola llothta]

MOS was horrible (except the action ), I can still see them following up even with a bad start

 

[KevCo]

MOS was horrible (except the action ), I can still see them following up even with a bad start

I enjoyed MOS, more so than the Chris Reeves versions.....

That being said, I am not a huge superman fan...I grew up on batman, xmen, and spiderman......

 

[Uno]

1. It's too close to Cap 3.

2. Marvel bringing out Spiderman for Cap 3 is a direct head shot at DC.

3. DC's no comic relief policy will come back to bite them in the ass.

Link?

 

[Lord Piffington]

Marvel hasn't even made a better movie than TDK.

the words of a true stan... cap 2, avengers, guardians of the galaxy and iron man 1 shyts all over tdk..the only great thing tdk had was heaths performance everything else was forgettable

 

[Brandeezy]

the words of a true stan... cap 2, avengers, guardians of the galaxy and iron man 1 shyts all over tdk..the only great thing tdk had was heaths performance everything else was forgettable

what? The words of a true stan indeed

 

[Lord Piffington]

what? The words of a true stan indeed

Ok, homo...besides heaths performance...what stood out in tdk? begins was fukking better