Entropy Fan
Superstar
Why do cacs get to claim ancient Egypt wasn't black just cause the Egyptians looked more like black east African?
when east Africans are clearly black.
Yet get to claim ancient Greece even tho they are basically Christian middle easterners? They are not Aryan and have heavy non Nordic blood.
This bruh looking afghani
A caccette brings this man home and her parents would be like "this ay-rab aint marrying ma daughter"
This nikka walk into a bar in Tennessee everybody would be grilling him. He look like Raj in tech support
Greeks look like Turks, arabs , central Asian. A Greek would be looked at funny by cacs but they want to claim his history.
Why do Germans Brits and cacs in general get to claim Greek civilisation when they look like this
We are failing by not shytting on the basis of their while argument of supremacy.
Without Greece cacs lose a 1000 years of civilization and have to admit they were in caves raping each other and living in squalor and were getting owned by black Moors and arabs until 1500. All they have is 1700 and on. 300 years is a fart in the wind.
Thoughts ? Why do we let them get away without ridiculous claim?
when east Africans are clearly black.Yet get to claim ancient Greece even tho they are basically Christian middle easterners? They are not Aryan and have heavy non Nordic blood.
This bruh looking afghani
A caccette brings this man home and her parents would be like "this ay-rab aint marrying ma daughter"
This nikka walk into a bar in Tennessee everybody would be grilling him. He look like Raj in tech support
Greeks look like Turks, arabs , central Asian. A Greek would be looked at funny by cacs but they want to claim his history.
Why do Germans Brits and cacs in general get to claim Greek civilisation when they look like this
We are failing by not shytting on the basis of their while argument of supremacy.
Without Greece cacs lose a 1000 years of civilization and have to admit they were in caves raping each other and living in squalor and were getting owned by black Moors and arabs until 1500. All they have is 1700 and on. 300 years is a fart in the wind.
Thoughts ? Why do we let them get away without ridiculous claim?
Last edited:


They're a mongrel group of people; Normans, Romans, Greek, Anglo-Saxons, Celts, Jews, Gypsies etc.
Half of these nikkas never actually went to Egypt or the Pyramids or the Museums. Almost everyone who does comes back saying they were Black because its too much blackness to ignore. Same logic they use applies to Greece/Rome. They hated Nordics. Thought them savages. Didn't fukk with them. Don't look alike as Nordics and Germanics are pale while Southern Europeans are dark olive toned and look a shade or two lighter than Turks. Again. Ancient Greece/Rome hated Northern European and Western European people. Whereas in Egypt, they had a complicated and nuanced relationship with Nubia. At times they were competing/rival nations, then bitter enemies, then casual trading partners, and then at times, staunch allies and partners. When Egypt was being invaded by Arabs from the North, they called to Nubia to come help them
and Nubia came up and took control of Egypt because they had the stronger army at the time to protect Egypt from the Northerners. That's how the 25th dynasty came to be. And Egypt didn't look at it like they were being conquered. Nubian and Egyptian culture were so intertwined and indistinguishable, that is was actually considered a Renaissance period and a period of restoration to their original African customs
Yet Cacs will argue a bunch of nonsense. Egypt and Nubia had a Rome/Greece sorta relationship. Whereas there was no such relationship between Rome/Greece and far Western or Northern Europe because they hated them at the time and far Western/Northern Europe had no developed civilizations that far back in antiquity. Western/Northern Europe just borrowed alot of shyt from Rome after it fell and pretended there was this cultural connection eventhough Romans themselves would have spit on their barbarian ancestors.

