You Rondo stans are silly.No one's denying anything. The 2012 ECF went 7 games, according to you analysis of Rondo it should of went 5. Since he is such a detriment to the offense.
You Rondo stans are silly.No one's denying anything. The 2012 ECF went 7 games, according to you analysis of Rondo it should of went 5. Since he is such a detriment to the offense.
OK, so we agree, Parker first out of all PGs.
After Parker, I'd go with Rondo. Ahead of Paul. Ahead of D-Rose. Ahead of Westbrook.
You can't tell these stans anything because they are going to bring up Rondo's tripe double and ignore how Rondo's flaw hurt his team more than it helps it.You Rondo stans are silly.
The game was an anomaly. How many times has an offense led by Rondo (not by Pierce or KG) scored over 120 points? And let's not act like Rondo puit 50 poinyts...... he had 13.....
You can't tell these stans anything because they are going to bring up Rondo's tripe double and ignore how Rondo's flaw hurt his team more than it helps it.
You need to stop looking at the stats because sometimes the numbers doesn't tell the entire story.
No it doesn't. It had nothing to do with the aging lineup. Do you want to know why? Because last season happened - last season during the games where Rondo played they were ranked around 25th-27th in the league in pace........ there was no KG or Pierce on that squad.Did you even watch the game. The pace was accelerated generating more points because of more possessions. That's the difference. In most the Big 3 Era, pace was slower generating less possessions due to age of starting lineup. This debunks the assumption that Rondo stagnates offense.
The Nets were actually worse when Pierce/KG were on the floor. How's that for HOFers?No it doesn't. It had nothing to do with the aging lineup. Do you want to know why? Because last season happened - last season during the games where Rondo played they were ranked around 25th-27th in the league in pace........ there was no KG or Pierce on that squad.
No it doesn't. It had nothing to do with the aging lineup. Do you want to know why? Because last season happened - last season during the games where Rondo played they were ranked around 25th-27th in the league in pace........ there was no KG or Pierce on that squad.
Here is a better question @SuperCoolP_Cal
Would you give Rondo a Max contract? Just curious
This is what i mean when i say a player you build around. I'm talking about the player you break the bank for and get him at any cost (money wise or trade wise)
Certain players are cornerstone players. You do what you have to to get them. I could see some teams doing this to get Curry and Rose and even CP3 when he was balling. At no point in Rondo's career would i do that for him.
So a simple YES or NO would do: You overthrow Danny boy from the front office today and Rondo says he's 100% and he wants the max TODAY. Do you give it to him?
It is painfully irrelevant to base an argument ast season. Talk about small sample size and other factors. If I based D Rose on last season, I would conclude he was woefully trash and shouldnt be in the NBA. LOL if the past season is the basis of your argument. You truly are reaching then.No he was rehabbing. Taking it slow and only played only like 30 games of the season. But keep basing shyt of last season, knowing damn well the Cs weren't even trying to contend.