Breh intellectually destroys Joe Rogan

[old pig]

I was objective when I read IVS's book back in high school in the 80's.

He's not a reliable source of information and peer review shows his lapses in judgement and procedure in-full.​

which other peer reviews?

I’m always open to new information

 

[hustlemania]

“it’s not about choosing sides” then goes on to explain why he chose a side...I did in fact watch the entire podcast as I stated I would objectively listen to him even tho I didn’t agree w/ an early point he made and some other points subsequently but even a broken clock is right 2x out the day (ironically somebody else in here said this in another thread unfortunately he’s not too versed on this topic to realize it applies here as well to “hotep jesus”)

one point that dude brought up that I (and others) agreed w/ led to further conversation in which I stated the correct author of the book you mentioned (that I also read many years ago)...it would be an even better conversation if some of you got over this guy and tried to focus on the finer points instead of choosing sides...me agreeing w/ that one point does not equate to me championing dude or seeking his guidance lol...I know nothing about him...but the one point he mentioned that was of note actually led to a healthy discussion among some of us

why would I choose a side, when neither of them knows wtf their talking about..

what kinda “healthy discussion” could anyone possibly get from some dude who doesn’t even know what he’s taking about..?

not to mention- this same discussions been in here numerous times.. same books, and points he’s ATTEMPTING to make.. clearly you didn’t listen to the entire podcast.. which is my main point in the first place.. but, I see you glanced over that, and got defensive..

“healthy discussion” .. you can have the last word, man..

 

[MercuryHayes]

Shoutout to jamie for “fact checking” and finding articles that supported the theory hotep was speaking on.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

which other peer reviews?

I’m always open to new information

The one I posted for starters. Within the article are other sources that have been peer-reviewed as well.​

 

[hustlemania]

I was objective when I read IVS's book back in high school in the 80's.

He's not a reliable source of information and peer review shows his lapses in judgement and procedure in-full.​

“Nah.. you just choosing sides.. " thecoli.com

 

[old pig]

The one I posted for starters. Within the article are other sources that have been peer-reviewed as well.​

ok fair enough...I’ll start w/ that

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

“Nah.. you just choosing sides.. " thecoli.com

Sure. I choose the side that has evidence to support it and doesn't have to usurp another peoples' history with lies, obfuscation, and conjecture to bolster my own self-worth.

​

 

[JayGatsby]

nikkas always lookin for a pointless" victory"

 

[hustlemania]

Breh was 1/3rd facts, 1/3rd conjecture, 1/3rd nonsense.

thank you..

dude sounded like he read some comments off a few forums, and walked into the studio minutes after..

they asked dude about the Slave Trade, and he started talking about selling weed..

 

[hustlemania]

Sure. I choose the side that has evidence to support it and doesn't have to usurp another peoples' history with lies, obfuscation, and conjecture to bolster my own self-worth.

​

one thing I will say.. is you do actually fact-check, as well as post sources to back it up..

 

[klientel]

This thread title was click bait like a muthafukka

But it was still a good convo...on both sides actually

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

One more thing for those of you who still regard They Came Before Columbus as a factual telling of American History.......why does he quote from this book so much?

Myths Of Pre- Columbian America : Mackenzie, Donald A. : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive <=========link to book in PDF format.

It'd be one thing if he quoted from it in order to make a point, but he quotes from it AS FACT when the whole reason the book was written was to reveal MYTHS?​

 

[old pig]

One more thing for those of you who still regard They Came Before Columbus as a factual telling of American History.......why does he quote from this book so much?

Myths Of Pre- Columbian America : Mackenzie, Donald A. : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive <=========link to book in PDF format.

It'd be one thing if he quoted from it in order to make a point, but he quotes from it AS FACT when the whole reason the book was written was to reveal MYTHS?​

I’ll have to take a look @ this too before I foolishly jump in and co-sign or discredit it but @ least you’re pushing the point forward

 

[generic-username]

So Black Americans are Moors, Native Americans, Hebrew Israelites?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Breh also talks about ancient Egyptian artifacts in Ohio


Uncovering ancient Ohio: Artifacts found under local developments

More bullshyt. Those artifacts were attributed to the Hopewell Culture which was a talking-point for Mormons in seeking to prove their 'theory' regarding an ancient Hebrew culture that came to America, thus proving that the Book of Mormon was actually history instead of a well-known hoax made-up by Joseph Smith.

The ONLY other story regarding ancient African artifacts in America was proven to be a hoax.......

Burrows Cave - Wikipedia



To date, there have been NO African artifacts discovered in America that predate European colonization.​