Denver had no depth?We just saw a team win the chip with no depth
Denver had no depth?We just saw a team win the chip with no depth
I don't think people understand how role players work. The better your stars, the less the role players have to do, the better they look.Well that kinda matters when Kevin Durant is 35 and misses significant time with injuries every season and Beal ain’t exactly an Ironman either
KD, Booker, Beal & Ayton ain’t exactly KD-Steph-Klay-Draymond good and even then they had guys like Iggy & Livingston coming off the bench which is much better than what Phoenix projects to have
Suns’ll be top heavy with no bench.
I’d much rather try to swing big and miss than be a team like the Thunder who don’t do shyt but be smart, have great drafts and miss the playoffs consistently.ISpending is one thing: spending it responsibly is another. Those players are gonna miss too many games to establish the kind of chemistry necessary to beat a team like Denver. Everyone saw their weaknesses and thought, go trade Ayton for depth, get handcuffs for CP3 and KD when they miss time. Beal's not fixing that; we're just happy Beal gets to see if he can succeed or fail on this level. This is Valley Nets
Look who you're talking to breh.Denver had no depth?
accurate as fukkDame is gonna stay
Portland is gonna trade that pick for Porzingis
Portland will not make the playoffs
Dame will post subliminals on Instagram talkin bout "Loyalty only goes so far"
Rinse, Wash, Repeat
They had no bench outside of Bruce Brown. It was a reason why they'd stagger Murray's minutes and those non-Jokic ones looked rather ugly.Denver had no depth?
Told yall he wouldn’t play a game for the Wizards