Wargames
One Of The Last Real Ones To Do It
I’m not debating that, but those are all different than “I’m not serving you”Medical malpractice didn't go anywhere and doctors have thought black people had a high pain tolerance since slavery.
I’m not debating that, but those are all different than “I’m not serving you”Medical malpractice didn't go anywhere and doctors have thought black people had a high pain tolerance since slavery.
No I don't. And you are being glib, like the a$$hole you are.so you agree with the ruling
we're arguing that the bible isn't clearly against non-harlem activity now. gimme a breakthis isnt true
it just says "man should not lay with another man as he would a woman"
its a personal command, it doesnt necessarily say to mistreat someone who does such things
people misconstrue the commandments in the bible as a charge to execute the law of the bible. In truth, this is up to the priests (kohens) to execute
@Koichos
I’m not debating that, but those are all different than “I’m not serving you”
No juelz. I don't think anyone should be forced to do something they don't want to do. I also believe that if by doing that you disobey the law of the land you should suffer the consequences
No I don't. And you are being glib, like the a$$hole you are.
should a christian business owner be forced to participate in a gay wedding? yes or no?
what am i missing? you just took the justices' positionI don't think anyone (christian) should be forced to do something they don't want to do (work for gay wedding)
quote it instead of insinuatingwe're arguing that the bible isn't clearly against non-harlem activity now. gimme a break
100% on Clarence pro segregation stance…but his new wife and marriage thoif you have followed clarence thomas at all you would know he is actually PRO-segregation
he has a full length of anti-integration takes, his ultimate goal is to attack all race based determinations. The problem is that in the public space people should be able to exchange goods/services freely provided people are not damaging or disrupting their property
clarence doesnt understand that many people naturally favor either people who look like them or people they deem attractive at the expense of those who do not. Its a human nature thing not a legality thing. Thats why many of his takes are stupid (especially considering he is married to a white woman )
he has said numerous times that he is ashamed that he received his perks/positions due to AA and legality but forgets that many of these white people would not be here without theft and murder!
Nope. I would expect the law of the land to not allow discrimination of ANY kind, regardless of religious beliefs. You can make choices but deal with the consequences. What the Supreme court did today was allow discrimination without consequences. It's a wicked wicked precedent.what am i missing? you just took the justices' position
Then the broke dumb White people that wanted that time period back are going to learn that their families were actually broke and dumb in that time period too,We about to see what the 50's and 60's were really like dark times ahead.
we're arguing that the bible isn't clearly against non-harlem activity now. gimme a break
quote it instead of insinuating
its important to understand that the reasons why God says not to do something isnt because someone is going to punish you for breaking the law, the issue with breaking the law happens as soon as you break it.
I know you dont believe in it so why pretend to understand it?