the cac mamba
Veteran
do you think that a christian business owner should be forced to participate in a gay wedding? yes or no?
im no christian, but i cant possibly see how the answer is 'yes'
Breaking: Services can be denied to Gays (Supreme Court ruling)
- Thread starter levitate
- Start date
im no christian, but i cant possibly see how the answer is 'yes'
Field Marshall Bradley
Veteran
IF THE DOCTOR IS RACIST ENOUGH
TO TURN AWAY YOUR DYING KID,
HES GONNA KILL YOUR KID
ANYWAY IF HES FORCED
TO OPERATE ON HIM.
YOU nikkaS LIVE
IN SOME WEIRD FAIRYTALE LAND.
If that can be proven, or the doctor admits to that, that is a criminal act and a gargantuas lawsuit.
Supreme Court fukked up on this but elections have consequences.
Trump being allowed to put in 2 republican judges is a move that will be felt for decades.
But both sides right?
These mufukkaz basically saying its cool to descrimate.
And jackasses are celebrating like it's only affecting the alphabet community
Trump being allowed to put in 2 republican judges is a move that will be felt for decades.
But both sides right?
These mufukkaz basically saying its cool to descrimate.
And jackasses are celebrating like it's only affecting the alphabet community
I believe Christian business owners pick and choose what they consider untenable. Sin is sin according to the Bible. Why accommodate anything the bible disagrees with?
the problem is that by saying they can discriminate you've opened Pandora's Box on all discrimination with the ruling. You'd think the 6 justices who voted in favor of the discrimination would take into account the precedent it sets. But of course not.
The sin cherry picking has always been retarded to me.
My thing is, you ain't God, let him due to the judging if you're a Christian.
Fillerguy
Veteran
TheColi shyttakes are in full effect here.
Apparently, discrimination is okay because it means a bigot can't take our money. And our ancestors problem is that they wanted to do business with racists. I'd love to blame this on non-Black trolling but I've heard ppl say this shyt to my face, like they were making a point.
Refusing someone service and choosing not accept a person's services are two different things. If I need medication and the only available retailer in my region hates Blacks, I'm fukked. I would either change homes or ship from a vendor that is outside my region, both of which are costly and could potentially bankrupt me. Making this type discrimination unconstitutional opens up the retailer to several federal and civil lawsuits if they refuse to service me or tamper with any services I aquire.
Anti-discrimination laws protect customers from businesses. Once again, the SCOTUS sides against its citizens. They trying to bring us back to the late 1800s, when the government bent over for corporations. I expect Brown to neutered before my grandmother dies. WATTBA
Apparently, discrimination is okay because it means a bigot can't take our money. And our ancestors problem is that they wanted to do business with racists. I'd love to blame this on non-Black trolling but I've heard ppl say this shyt to my face, like they were making a point.
Refusing someone service and choosing not accept a person's services are two different things. If I need medication and the only available retailer in my region hates Blacks, I'm fukked. I would either change homes or ship from a vendor that is outside my region, both of which are costly and could potentially bankrupt me. Making this type discrimination unconstitutional opens up the retailer to several federal and civil lawsuits if they refuse to service me or tamper with any services I aquire.
Anti-discrimination laws protect customers from businesses. Once again, the SCOTUS sides against its citizens. They trying to bring us back to the late 1800s, when the government bent over for corporations. I expect Brown to neutered before my grandmother dies. WATTBA
the cac mamba
Veteran
interesting juelzing, but why can't you answer the question?
should a christian business owner be forced to participate in a gay wedding? yes or no?
this isnt true
it just says "man should not lay with another man as he would a woman"
its a personal command, it doesnt necessarily say to mistreat someone who does such things
people misconstrue the commandments in the bible as a charge to execute the law of the bible. In truth, this is up to the priests (kohens) to execute
@Koichos
His “proof” for Obama being a DL homo with a fake family was to bring up an article about the racist CAC who started the rumor in the first place. Dude’s brain is fukking mush
Medical malpractice didn't go anywhere and doctors have thought black people had a high pain tolerance since slavery.
null
...
No juelz. I don't think anyone should be forced to do something they don't want to do. I also believe that if by doing that you disobey the law of the land you should suffer the consequences.
the cac mamba
Veteran
so you agree with the ruling
if you have followed clarence thomas at all you would know he is actually PRO-segregation
he has a full length of anti-integration takes, his ultimate goal is to attack all race based determinations. The problem is that in the public space people should be able to exchange goods/services freely provided people are not damaging or disrupting their property
clarence doesnt understand that many people naturally favor either people who look like them or people they deem attractive at the expense of those who do not. Its a human nature thing not a legality thing. Thats why many of his takes are stupid (especially considering he is married to a white woman
)he has said numerous times that he is ashamed that he received his perks/positions due to AA and legality but forgets that many of these white people would not be here without theft and murder!
