BREAKING: Roe v Wade has been overturned by the Supreme Court #BothSides

[Field Marshall Bradley]

1. Sanger wasn’t racist.

2. Black ppl back then wanted resources for contraception.

3. Eugenics was a widely accepted concept back then by black and white ppl. Hitler at one point wanted to use eugenics as a means to eradicate Jews and Sanger condemn him for that. As a result her books were banned in Nazi Germany.

Your whole post is disingenuous… You using Dubois as a measuring stick for how all black people felt is irresponsible and flat out wrong….

 

[NoMayo15]

To start, men on the coil and men in general have NEVER had the right to kill their unborn child, and those who try to go to prison for murder as anyone who kills a human, unborn or not, should. Men have always been “forced” into parenthood the same way women claim they are “forced” into parenthood without the option to kill their unborn child. Grown ass people acting as if someone is forcing them to be a parent when they were the one who chose raw sex is absolutely ridiculous. Women know this and bash men who do so, call them trash and deadbeats for playing victim and neglecting their parental responsibility, but will never admit to the fact that they do the same thing or worse to neglect their parental responsibility by killing their unborn child, abandoning their child at fire stations, putting their child up for adoption without telling the father bc they don’t want to have to pay child support etc.


Abortion= killing an unborn child. The definition of fetus is literally “unborn child” or “unborn human offspring”. They call the unborn child a different name so that people can detach from the fact that the child is a child, which allows for more people to devalue their lives and be ok with killing them. It’s basic psychology





Look at the stats, all except for .3% of abortions were due to unprotected sex.


For the times when killing or removing the unborn child from the womb is necessary it is legal and not a choice. Ex. When women have miscarriages often times some parts of the baby do not come out naturally and have to be removed. Those stats are not included in abortion stats bc they are necessary procedures and not something done bc the woman wants to abandon her parental responsibilities after consenting to raw sex.






Choosing to have RAW sex IS choosing to become a parent. If you don’t want to be a parent then you know not to have raw sex, yet they still consent to it. Condoms and birth control are 100% when used together. Not only that, but plan B is available.


It doesn’t take perfection to refuse to consent to raw sex, nor to take birth control, nor to take plan b after you have raw sex. You’re trying to come up with any excuse you can think of, but with modern technology and medicine, there literally are no excuses. And bc of that plus the fact you don’t know what you’re talking about yet will sit and argue all day, this will be my only response to you. Bye

I'm going to respond to this in full later, but you didn't actually address my points. Instead, you just repeated the nonsense you said before, and added some bullshyt ass statistic that you apparently pulled right from your ass. You are just deluding yourself if you think 99.9% of unintended pregnancies are due to people not giving a fukk, using zero protection and saying "fukk it, I'll just abort later", as if its just on some whim. And you're also fukking wrong that men don't decide to abort WITH THEIR PARTNER. You know, there are situations in which both men and women consider ending a pregnancy together?? Obviously men can't force an abortion, but to pretend that men have absolutely no say is to ignore reality. Families make these decisions all the time.

 

[Giselle]

You said all that and yet people are still going to have RAW sex and still find some way to get abortion. People act as if an abortion ban is some kind of tool to correct human behavior when it isn't. People will have raw sex, have abortions in secrecy or dangerous conditions or bring a child into this world that they're unable to nurture or provide for. Overall it will result in more human suffering.

It will influence many people to make better sexual health choices, which benefits everyone. Others will continue to make poor choices and will take accountability for their actions, woman up and raise their kids, or suffer the consequences. If they choose to die trying to kill instead of caring about their health, that’s on them.

 

[¯\_(ツ)_/¯]

Your whole post is disingenuous… You using Dubois as a measuring stick for how all black people felt is irresponsible and flat out wrong….

Its really not, blacks during the early 20th century supported several forms of eugenics. For any blacks not in the intellectual circle there was no pushback or condemnation on eugenics until the 1960s.

After what was revelaed in Nazi Germany eugenics became a lot more unpopular but before then many people (including blacks) saw it as fairly harmless:

In 1905, the Harvard-educated professor and civil rights activist W.E.B. DuBois adopted eugenic principles. He believed “only fit blacks should procreate to eradicate the race’s heritage of moral iniquity.” Dr. Thomas Wyatt Turner, a charter member of the NAACP, and many black academics at Tuskegee, Howard, and Hampton universities promoted “Assimilationist Eugenics.” They proposed that “The Talented Tenth” of all races should mix, as the best blacks were as good as the best whites. These folks were a bit more evolved in that they believed genetics was co-equal with environment. In later years the NAACP promoted eugenics theory by hosting “Better Baby” contests with the proceeds going to its anti-lynching campaign.

https://www.jpands.org/vol19no4/singleton.pdf

 

[Micky Mikey]

It will influence many people to make better sexual health choices, which benefits everyone. Others will continue to make poor choices and will take accountability for their actions, woman up and raise their kids, or suffer the consequences. If they choose to die trying to kill instead of caring about their health, that’s on them.

Lol You literally sound like a fundamentalist religious zealot. Is there any evidence to suggest this will cause people to not make poor decisions or are you just assuming this? How many is many to justify it?

 

[AquaCityBoy]

It will influence many people to make better sexual health choices, which benefits everyone. Others will continue to make poor choices and will take accountability for their actions, woman up and raise their kids, or suffer the consequences. If they choose to die trying to kill instead of caring about their health, that’s on them.

Sociopath shyt.

 

[Field Marshall Bradley]

Its really not, blacks during the early 20th century supported several forms of eugenics. For any blacks not in the intellectual circle there was no pushback or condemnation on eugenics until the 1960s.

After what was revelaed in Nazi Germany eugenics became a lot more unpopular but before then many people (including blacks) saw it as fairly harmless:

In 1905, the Harvard-educated professor and civil rights activist W.E.B. DuBois adopted eugenic principles. He believed “only fit blacks should procreate to eradicate the race’s heritage of moral iniquity.” Dr. Thomas Wyatt Turner, a charter member of the NAACP, and many black academics at Tuskegee, Howard, and Hampton universities promoted “Assimilationist Eugenics.” They proposed that “The Talented Tenth” of all races should mix, as the best blacks were as good as the best whites. These folks were a bit more evolved in that they believed genetics was co-equal with environment. In later years the NAACP promoted eugenics theory by hosting “Better Baby” contests with the proceeds going to its anti-lynching campaign.

https://www.jpands.org/vol19no4/singleton.pdf

You naming negroes that wanted favor from their white counterparts so of course parroting blatantly racist ideology under the guise of “health” was nothing to them….. The whole talented tenth concept wouldn’t have even manifested in real nikkas mind/spirit…. The concept came from a white man, WEB Dubois just got it popping…. And there is a reason why planned parenthood wants to disassociate itself from Sanger…..

 

[the bossman]

Sociopath shyt.

Anytime you get deep into politics or religion like this shyt goes wild left

 

[KyokushinKarateMan]

Ayeeeee I know what my next line of work gonna be

 

[Ozymandeas]

I don’t understand how y’all were brainwashed into believing that killing your unborn child is a human right that is so immoral to get rid of. There is literally many types of birth control and condoms, plus there is plan b which didn’t exist when that law was created. The updated studies in unborn children also didn’t exist but now that they have more information they see how it’s immoral to kill the womb baby.

And I’m sick of women whining about being “forced” to be a parent as if they didn’t consent to raw sex, it was their choice. And those be the same ones bashing “dead beat dads” when they’re all in the same boat but even worse bc they’re killing their kids to avoid being a parent.

just use the fcking birth control and make better choices before agreeing to raw sex. It’s that simple.

Off the strength of this topic, I googled abortion law for every country and the United States is one of the only places on Earth with no limits on abortion. The lionshare of countries around the world either prohibit it entirely or allow it before 12 weeks and then prohibit it. People are crying not even knowing 98% of the world already live this way. Personally, I think for special circumstances like rape, incest, teen pregnancies or if you can prove having a dire economic situation, it should be allowed. But like @HarlemHottie said about her friends, nobody should EVER be allowed to have 10-15 abortions. That's disgusting for real.

 

[Ozymandeas]

Most of them will be in poverty. Will you take care of them financially?

Their parents should. The U.S. Government has historically not given a fukk. They have always made the father pay child support because he chose to have raw sex and get a woman pregnant. Right or wrong? It's already been this way for men. Women just upset because the other shoe dropped for them. Now they have to be mothers if they act irresponsibly the same way men have been forced into fatherhood.

 

[Wild self]

Not in the same proportions

by 2070, this policy could result in a 20% black nation

50 years, just to STILL be under 50% ??

That's a fukked up tradeoff. Not even worth it, on top of the extreme poverty.

 

[Ozymandeas]

Sociopath shyt.

Gonna be a rough meeting with God if you died trying to get an abortion

 

[Wild self]

Apparently they’re coming for birth control next—they’re lumping it in as abortive services. All these Brehs celebrating this, what are y’all plans for when birth control and abortion aren’t options. I guess y’all will have to be accountable too huh? Lol.


Oan, this won’t end abortions. Women have been preparing for this possibility already and are prepared: The Future of Abortion in a Post-Roe America

It’s just sad that’s it coming to this—these men don’t care about the welfare of unwanted babies once they’re born. If men could have babies this wouldn’t even be on the table.

And if they are successful with this, they’ll get rid of gay marriage, trans rights (neither which I care about tbh) and civil rights (which we all need to care about, while some of you are celebrating about old white men doing this—they aren’t on your side)


@Booksnrain what are your thoughts on this?

Some of those dudes who want this, are better off masturbating.

 

[Wild self]

Overthrow the supreme court. War. Voting doesnt solve shyt. Majority voting literally doesnt matter in this electoral college system.

Like.....a bloody rebellion like The French Revolution where beheadings took place?