This doesn't really address my question though.
If she herself is unwilling to put that theory to the test after being shown evidence shooting holes all through it, why does anyone else still choose to run with it?
If it were true, she gets the one thing she wants more than anything in life. Justice for her only son who was murdered and closure for his death. And oh yeah, not to mention that small consolation prize that would damn near put her on the Forbes list overnight.
And those who believe it would get..............
. Well, not a damn thing actually other than internet sleuth bragging rites I suppose, but maybe thats something to hang a hat on.
Yet the people who gain virtually NOTHING are 100x more adamant about a theory than the woman who gains practically everything outside of having her son alive with her again if it were true.
Make it make sense breh. She brings a lawsuit. It goes back and forth in the judicial system for a few years. And as more and more evidence is presented, the theory starts to show leakage. She eventually drops Amir Muhammad from the lawsuit altogether when it becomes clear to her that some college educated married mortgage broker has jack shyt to do with this whole fiasco and isn't really some top secret assassin when the sun goes down. And later after that she withdraws the entire lawsuit, where it's been sitting in limbo for years.
But cops had to have been involved, because you can't ever trust the police. Under no circumstances can those fukkers be trusted. NEVER trust the police or law enforcement in a case like this.
Unless they happen to be former CIA agents who just so happen to agree with you.