BREAKING hezbullah was hit by another wave of exploding devices, as walkie-talkies used by the group blew up in homes, cars and in operatives' hands

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
307,316
Reputation
-34,317
Daps
617,753
Reppin
The Deep State
You understand so little about the world. Mossad's actions create 10x more jihadists than they kill, they don't "wipe out" anybody. You've never understood that if you want to stop creating more jihadists, you have to STOP the oppression and violence.

There are others who have killed more than Mossad has (like the USA in their invasion of Iraq) and all it did was INCREASE terrorism. If the USA killing 600,000 didn't wipe out terrorism, then how many do you think Mossad is going to have to kill to do it?







What an ironic analogy. The entire Batman franchise FEEDS off of the Joker and Batman both staying alive, they compliment each other. Batman never kills Joker in any major storyline, though there's one minor line where Batman finally snaps and kills Joker.....but only after a war where all of Gotham is destroyed first.
what are you personally willing to condone to stop the spread of radical islam?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
LMAOOOOO

WITOUT MOSSAD THE WORLD WOULD BE RAN BY ISLAMIST EXTERMISTS WHO HATE EVERYTHING ABOUT YOUR EXISTENCE


Wait until Sccit learns that Mossad has only existed since 1949 (though, of course, their informal precursors had been around a couple decades at least by that point) .....and terrorism has gotten MUCH worse in that time period, not better.

If the world would be ran by Islamic extremists without Mossad.....then where were they before Mossad? Look at how little Islamic terrorism there was previous to Israeli and American interference in the region, and then try to imagine how distorted your worldview has to be to believe that Mossad is somehow making that situation BETTER and not worse.





THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WIT “OPPRESSION” …. THE FACT THAT U THINK HEZBOLLAH GIVES HALF A SHIIT BOUT WHATS GOING ON WIT “PALESTINIANS” IS FUCCING HILARIOUS….


Hezbollah wasn't created to fight for Palestine, Hezbollah was created to fight the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon. Israeli aggression LITERALLY led directly to the creation of Hezbollah, and you're too blind to see it.




THEY HAVE MUCH BIGGER GOALS. I KNOW THIS CONFLICT IS ALL NEW TO
U BUT SOME OF THE IDEAS U HAVE ARE STRAIGHT UP HILARIOUS AND ITS CUTE HOW NAIVE U ARE.. BUT ALSO SCARY.


You know nothing whatsoeer about this conflict (or any conflict, or anything about geopolitics whatsoever) other than what your skin-deep allegiances have told you to believe. You're no different than a White Supremacist who thinks he "knows" Black people and assumes every who tells him he's full of shyt is just naive.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
what are you personally willing to condone to stop the spread of radical islam?


A foreign policy that focuses on human rights and release from oppression rather than sanctioning the actions of anyone who we happened to be allied with.

A refusal to buy oil that funds such terrorists or despots whose actions encourage terrorism, such as the Saudis.

An attempt to reduce our oil consumption overall to a tiny fraction of the current use and thus crash the market, which currently funds a huge amount of such terrorism (not to mention the Russians, etc.).
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,231
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,086
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Wait until Sccit learns that Mossad has only existed since 1949 (though, of course, their informal precursors had been around a couple decades at least by that point) .....and terrorism has gotten MUCH worse in that time period, not better.

If the world would be ran by Islamic extremists without Mossad.....then where were they before Mossad? Look at how little Islamic terrorism there was previous to Israeli and American interference in the region, and then try to imagine how distorted your worldview has to be to believe that Mossad is somehow making that situation BETTER and not worse.








Hezbollah wasn't created to fight for Palestine, Hezbollah was created to fight the Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon. Israeli aggression LITERALLY led directly to the creation of Hezbollah, and you're too blind to see it.







You know nothing whatsoeer about this conflict (or any conflict, or anything about geopolitics whatsoever) other than what your skin-deep allegiances have told you to believe. You're no different than a White Supremacist who thinks he "knows" Black people and assumes every who tells him he's full of shyt is just naive.


LMFAOOOOOO

THE ENTIRE LEVANT WAS CONQUERED BY MUSLIM EXTREMISTS WELL BEFORE 1949 GENIUS

THE REASON THERE WAS LESS TERRORISM DURING THOSE CONQUESTS WAS DUE TO THERE BEING NO ONE TO COMBAT THEIR BRUTAL TAKEOVERS

SO WHY WOULD THEY NEED TERRORISM FOR?

HEZBOLLAH IS A GROUP OF MUSLIM EXTREMISTS WHO ADVOCATE SHIA EMPOWERMENT GLOBALLY

THEY BELIEVE IN THE ANNIHILATION OF JEWS… SO IF JEWS OR ANYONE WHO DOESNT COWER TO THEIR IDEOLOGY COMES ALONG, THEY WILL FORM LIKE VOLTRON N MAKE IT A MISSION TO DESTROY THEM.

BLAMING ISRAEL FOR HEZBOLLAH IS LIKE BLAMING NON-WHITES FOR THE KKK

U SHOULD FALL BACK INSTEAD OF TRYNA WHITESPLAIN MY HISTORY TO ME HOMIE
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
LMFAOOOOOO

THE ENTIRE LEVANT WAS CONQUERED BY MUSLIM EXTREMISTS WELL BEFORE 1949 GENIUS

THE REASON THERE WAS LESS TERRORISM DURING THOSE CONQUESTS WAS DUE TO THERE BEING NO ONE TO COMBAT THEIR BRUTAL TAKEOVERS

SO WHY WOULD THEY NEED TERRORISM FOR?


Israel has an entire holy book bragging about all the people they conquered, do you think that was wrong?

You claimed that Muslims could not be satisfied until they had overtaken the world, and only Mossad could stop them from terrorizing the world. Now you're claiming that they spent 1000+ years satisfied with just the Levant (a tiny proportion of the world) and felt no need to use terrorism to expand beyond that. So which is it?




HEZBOLLAH IS A GROUP OF MUSLIM EXTREMISTS WHO BELIEVE ADVOCATE SHIA EMPOWERMENT GLOBALLY


Yet you ignore that they didn't exist until Israel invaded southern Lebanon, and were formed as a DIRECT REACTION to that invasion. You're unable to analyze or process even the possibility that Israeli aggression and killing could ever be a mistake.
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,231
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,086
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Israel has an entire holy book bragging about all the people they conquered, do you think that was wrong?

You claimed that Muslims could not be satisfied until they had overtaken the world, and only Mossad could stop them from terrorizing the world. Now you're claiming that they spent 1000+ years satisfied with just the Levant (a tiny proportion of the world) and felt no need to use terrorism to expand beyond that. So which is it?







Yet you ignore that they didn't exist until Israel invaded southern Lebanon, and were formed as a DIRECT REACTION to that invasion. You're unable to analyze or process even the possibility that Israeli aggression and killing could ever be a mistake.


SO IN SHORT, UR SAYING THAT IF IT WASNT FOR ISRAEL THEN RADICAL ISLAM IDEOLOGY WOULDNT EXIST?

ROFLMAOOOOO

8-F71825-A-27-B0-4815-9-A13-6500081-CA67-D.jpg



IF IT WASNT FOR ISRAEL, IT WOULD BE MUCH WORSE THAN THIS AND WOULD STILL BE SPREADING LIKE WILDFIRE
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
Would like some examples




Just in my lifetime: Marcos fleeing from the Phillippines, the retreat of USSR from Afghanistan, the collapse of the Eastern Bloc states, the fall of the Soviet Union, the end of Apartheid in South Africa, the Taliban retake of Afghanistan and the Russian failure to take Ukraine. Going back slightly further you have the American retreat from Vietnam of course, and the collapse of the British empire from 1940s-1960s starting with Gandhi forcing them out of India. Going back way further you have Christianity taking over the Roman Empire without a shot fired and despite at times severe oppression.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,838
Reppin
the ether
Crazy shist is, with Sccit's temperment and ideology, he would DEFINITELY be pro-Hezbollah if he had been born Muslim. Not that he would actually put in work (just like he does little for Israel and won't live there), but a Muslim sccit would definitely reflexively support Islamists just like he reflexively supports anyone of his own background.



SO IN SHORT, UR SAYING THAT IF IT WASNT FOR ISRAEL THEN RADICAL ISLAM IDEOLOGY WOULDNT EXIST?


I didn't say that. There are violent idiots in every religion. But without the USA and Israel, radical islamists would be marginalized. Hezbollah definitely wouldn't exist, neither would Hamas, neither would ISIS, and Khomeini never would have taken control of Iran. Probably no Taliban either.

Few people will throw their lives away like that without an obvious enemy. USA and Israel keep giving them motive.




ROFLMAOOOOO

8-F71825-A-27-B0-4815-9-A13-6500081-CA67-D.jpg



IF IT WASNT FOR ISRAEL, IT WOULD BE MUCH WORSE THAN THIS AND WOULD STILL BE SPREADING LIKE WILDFIRE


The height of Muslim territory was in the year 711. How was Israel responsible for containg the spread of Muslims for 1200 years before they existed? :dead:

What do you think that map is even showing? Change "Arabic" to "English" and the map growth would look way more extreme. Does that prove something? :laff:


Now, I asked you a question about Jewish conquests in the Old Testament. Do you think those were wrong, or not? Because those conquests were much more brutal, so you have a problem with that, right?
 

Sccit

LA'S MOST BLUNTED
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
56,231
Reputation
-19,894
Daps
75,086
Reppin
LOS818ANGELES
Crazy shist is, with Sccit's temperment and ideology, he would DEFINITELY be pro-Hezbollah if he had been born Muslim. Not that he would actually put in work (just like he does little for Israel and won't live there), but a Muslim sccit would definitely reflexively support Islamists just like he reflexively supports anyone of his own background.






I didn't say that. There are violent idiots in every religion. But without the USA and Israel, radical islamists would be marginalized. Hezbollah definitely wouldn't exist, neither would Hamas, neither would ISIS, and Khomeini never would have taken control of Iran. Probably no Taliban either.

Few people will throw their lives away like that without an obvious enemy. USA and Israel keep giving them motive.







The height of Muslim territory was in the year 711. How was Israel responsible for containg the spread of Muslims for 1200 years before they existed? :dead:

What do you think that map is even showing? Change "Arabic" to "English" and the map growth would look way more extreme. Does that prove something? :laff:


Now, I asked you a question about Jewish conquests in the Old Testament. Do you think those were wrong, or not? Because those conquests were much more brutal, so you have a problem with that, right?





SO WHEN MUSLIM RADICALS TOOK OVER IRAN….


THAT WAS BECAUSE OF JEWS TOO?


YOU LITERALLY HAVE NO IDEA WTF U TALKIN ABOUT


SIT THIS ONE OUT SPORT

JEWS NEVER SPREAD THEIR IDEOLOGIES LIKE WILDFIRE WHILE FORCING OTHERS TO ADHERE TO THEIR WAYS.. THATS WHY WE SO FEW IN NUMBER COMPARED TO MUSLIMS.. WE CAPTURED CANAAN VIA GODS COMMAND IN THE BIBLICAL ERA AND THATS IT.. WENT THOUSANDS OF YEARS WITOUT A NATION POST ROMAN CONQUEST…. COMPARING THAT TO THE SPREAD OF RADICAL ISLAM IS INSANELY RETARDED.
 
Top