Bouncing idea's 🏀: 2024 NBA Off-Season: Key Decisions and Developments

CarltonJunior

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 21, 2014
Messages
47,570
Reputation
5,634
Daps
132,011
Reppin
Duval County
the main issue is years - on both parties here

players taking up a certain percentage of the cap to maintain the floor? cool.

if you're the bulls, why commit 5 years to that block of spending for a guy who's made essentially no progress. teams sign bloated 1+1 deals all the time to maintain the salary floor. typically for established guys on top of that.

if you're the player, 5 years basically says you're comfortable and you've no plans of ever betting on yourself. dude was a top 5 pick and he's running from his own money.
"But it's the going rate. This is the new normal. Y'all nikkas don't understand salary cap and TV deals."
 

SchoolboyC

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
22,611
Reputation
3,910
Daps
95,951
18-20 mill per is the new avg for a below avg startern

As it stands $18 mil would make him the 87th highest paid player this season and after FA ends he might be outside the top 100. And that ranking will get lower and lower as the years go on (Assuming the salary is flat and not increasing by year)

Either way it’s puzzling to give him a 5 year deal. If I were them I would’ve waited for someone to give him an offer sheet or make him play on the QO. Signing up for 9 years of Patrick Williams is an interesting choice
 

42 Monks

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 20, 2014
Messages
56,364
Reputation
9,460
Daps
209,337
Reppin
Carolina
"But it's the going rate. This is the new normal. Y'all nikkas don't understand salary cap and TV deals."
im just saying, if you look at salaries like a % of the cap its whatever... the years make no sense for either of them

dude getting paid like he has no intention of ever having a breakout season, improving, or becoming key player to that org - ever. and the bulls keep confirming that they have no concept of a plan or what they actually want to do

but if you can lock up a guy happy to be the next nick collison, you gotta do it :wow:
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,732
Reputation
-13,949
Daps
130,940
Doesn’t work because there’s a max salary number so you have to pay certain players to reach the salary floor.
I know that’s why I said it’s dumb

It’s better for everyone if these players earned their money.
 

CrimsonTider

Seduce & Scheme
WOAT
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,732
Reputation
-13,949
Daps
130,940
the main issue is years - on both parties here

players taking up a certain percentage of the cap to maintain the floor? cool.

if you're the bulls, why commit 5 years to that block of spending for a guy who's made essentially no progress. teams sign bloated 1+1 deals all the time to maintain the salary floor. typically for established guys on top of that.

if you're the player, 5 years basically says you're comfortable and you've no plans of ever betting on yourself. dude was a top 5 pick and he's running from his own money.
All I’m saying

Why would a league and owners want to make this type of commitment to players that do not matter
 
Top