Black supremacists AKA ignorant concious fellas let me holla @ you

MostReal

Bandage Hand Steph
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
25,299
Reputation
3,362
Daps
57,188
You FORGOT the Malaysians, Filipinos, Swedish, Turkish, Irish, Ukrainians, Poles, Iriquois, Puerto Ricans, Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, Rudolf, and the 1989 Chicago Bears. All BLACK. So were the 7 dwarves. 7? You think THAT is a COINCIDENCE? The wicked witch of the WHITE does not want YOU to KNOW that. I am NOT anti-white. I simply hope THOSE dog-fukking, cave-dwelling, recessive-gene-having DEVILS are mad THAT I tell the TRUTH. Rocky Balboa was BLACK. Knowledge is POWER.

:russ: this dudes best post ever...you killed it on that one :laff:


i'm sure there is cover-up....but does this history all of a sudden uplift ignorant people?
does this stop the killing and drug dealing?


success is success and in 2013 people should know better! my black ass don't need to know about kings and queens of Africa to feel inspired to succeed in anything. I can look at bill gates and zuckerberg and see people that didn't graduate college be successful just like I do Jay-Z in the self-branding and entertainment arena. I DON'T THINK YOU NEED TO SEE A BLACK PERSON DO SOMETHING IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH A GOAL and I don't want kids thinking that B.S. If you see another race do it...you can do it do too because they human just like you!


those people are killing themselves because they think they are nothing & worth nothing. If the information reaches a few of them it may start to change some of their perceptions of themselves. It won't cure the world but its a base. A solid foundation to build on for a lot of kids that don't know anything other than 'I suppose to not learn how to speak, be a good citizen, because I'm black.' This self hate is very powerful man. Exposure is ALWAYS a good thing...it allows you to see life outside of your own foxhole.
 

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
Yeah, black people in those positions are the most turned off by it because when you say Black you are shining a spotlight on them (they feel) and it makes them uncomfortable.

Most of these posters don't work with black children or black or white educators. They don't understand the mentality behind the manipulation that sparked the Need for African centered research and ideas. The can't understand why any person would be pro black. If a meeting is set up at my job and the attendees are notified that I'm the POC for it.... my name seems white as hell. So when I show up it's just funny the reaction I get. There are times I could call or connect on LinkedIn ahead of time - I don't because I'm black and you can lose business this way. In school it's not emphazied that Egypt was an African civilization. It's clearly in Africa but I've heard actually college professors at MSU alluded to other BS ideas.

Regardless, its seems that none of these people have actually spoken to a black student about black history. The average black student will say sh1t about MLK and those movements and leave it at that. Meanwhile we know the entire white washed history of Europe, and America.

:stopitslime: Clearly you are a victim of no child left behind because you have problems with basic thinking and definition..let me repeat myself

THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS..in fact its a wonderful thing ...we should know who we are and where we come from


BLACK SUPREMACY IS KOONING..when you say dumb things like whitefolks are melanin deficient cave dwelling apes and then someone like yourself ends up fetching sandwitches and taking your white bosses dirty draws to the cleaners ....:heh:.....that self ether leaves scars on the soul........im guessing thats why alot of you come online with these faux black power personas
 

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
Most of them don't respect black history themselves and genrally accept the white version of history as gospel. Its sad and pathetic at the same time. I like Tariq Nasheed and Umar Johnson because they pose questions that have never really been asked by most mainstream historians, black or white. Admittedly some of their postulations need further, more indept study, but to simply dismiss their theories as nonsense is extremely myopic, and does nothing to clarify the currently murky picture we have of the true contributions of black people to the world.

White people and c00ns get infuriated because these brother's theories goes against all the information they have been parading as fact for the past few decades. Anyone who is a student of history knows there has been a concerted effort by white people to either minimize or completely eliminate the contributions of black africans to the development of world culture and development. And judging by the many people in this thread (and this forum)that always attempt to "shout down" any viewpoint not commonly accepted by the white mainstream shows that those initial white racist historians have done their job exceedingly well.
:childplease: You really are a clown...youre actually gonna ride for Umar Johnsons crackpot theories...

:ld: You get your knowledge from a guy who gives $50 dollar psychic consultations...im guessing you already knew cos you probably paid extra to put your face in his crotch and just suck out the "knowledge"
 

Blackgate

💩🔛🤡🤡🤡
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
1,297
Reputation
320
Daps
5,202
:beli:

We arent all descendants of kings and queens...most of us are descendants of the people who were mixing the cement or cutting the stones for them pyramids breh.

.someone had to clean the palace toilets :yeshrug:...

But thats beside the point i agree its empowering to learn your history but lets have some common sense about it because lying to oneself can be just as damaging


:mjpls: And thats what im getting at..if the white man makes you feel inferior..the solution isnt trying to be superior..you have to dismantle the inferiority complex because the superiority complex is just masking the problem..deep down youre still admitting someone is better than someone else and if youre not in a position of economic or political power guess who the second class citizen is by default

All those are valid but the government is really more a tool for the ruling classes..i think its foolish to expect it to work in your interests unless your interests serve the system somehow




I dont celebrate genocidal spanish pirates...word to my native peoples

and i have no problem with black history,knowledge or awareness but its sad when i run into these smart dumb nikkas who will tell me how Julius Cesar was black but have no idea who kwame nkurumah or marcus garvey were :upsetfavre:

They tell me all this mythical shyt about kemet but have no idea about great zimbabwe



agreed


marcus garvey was absolutely what you would call a 'black supremacist'...
 

the mechanic

Greasy philosophy
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
1,472
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,916
marcus garvey was absolutely what you would call a 'black supremacist'...

In his initial works perhaps..later he was more of a pan Africanist

Thats beside the point anyway he was an influential black historical figure..worth knowing about

right?
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
82,040
Reputation
11,860
Daps
221,907
You FORGOT the Malaysians, Filipinos, Swedish, Turkish, Irish, Ukrainians, Poles, Iriquois, Puerto Ricans, Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donner, Blitzen, Rudolf, and the 1989 Chicago Bears. All BLACK. So were the 7 dwarves. 7? You think THAT is a COINCIDENCE? The wicked witch of the WHITE does not want YOU to KNOW that. I am NOT anti-white. I simply hope THOSE dog-fukking, cave-dwelling, recessive-gene-having DEVILS are mad THAT I tell the TRUTH. Rocky Balboa was BLACK. Knowledge is POWER.

:laff:
 

Blackgate

💩🔛🤡🤡🤡
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
1,297
Reputation
320
Daps
5,202
In his initial works perhaps..later he was more of a pan Africanist

Thats beside the point anyway he was an influential black historical figure..worth knowing about

right?

i admire and respect garvey greatly even if i dont fully agree with his ideology...he was prescient as fukk...garvey would have been extremely useful to anyone [especially black folks] who recognized his value...i dont believe garvey ever softened his position on black supremacy (in africa)...he might have also been a pan africanist as you say...
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,223
i admire and respect garvey greatly even if i dont fully agree with his ideology...he was prescient as fukk...garvey would have been extremely useful to anyone [especially black folks] who recognized his value...i dont believe garvey ever softened his position on black supremacy (in africa)...he might have also been a pan africanist as you say...

They don't understand about respect.

We aren't going to agree with every point made by someone like Malcolm X or J A Rogers or Garvey, but respect them for what they represent. Criticisms do come from problack people towards Afrocentrism and panafricanist... but it's done constructively, not in the c00nish manner we see here. 'Their ' motivation is to pigeon hole entire ideologies and movements to fit some caricature that represents a type of black personality who makes them uncomfortable.
 

OsO

Souldier
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,039
Reputation
1,147
Daps
12,060
Reppin
Harlem
without consensus on the definition of the term "black" all of this conversation is moot. i guarantee when each individual in this thread says "black" everyone conjures up a different concept of what "black" is. when you ask an individual what their definition of black is, about who they consider black and who they dont, eventually you can break it down to the granular level where we see race as a social construct, and to a degree totally subjective.

the term 'african' is just as misleading. one, the term africa and its etymological origin is highly debated, so we dont really know where this term came from. two, the ancient peoples of africa did not refer to themselves as africans. africa is a modern name. so here we find ourselves again dealing in social constructs of race and culture.

so its not accurate to generalize and say 'black,' and its also not accurate to generalize and say 'african.'

but that being said there are still a lot of misrepresentations in this thread.

the various cultures of what we consider "africa" have had considerable influence on the rest of the world, much more than they're given credit for. thousands of years ago the ancient kingdoms of africa were colonizing what we know today as the middle east, europe, and even into parts of asia.

but even the ancient african cultures had origins in an even more ancient culture, the same culture whose influence is responsible for the family of pyramids that exist throughout the world. but people have a hard time grasping the idea that an advanced culture could have existed tens of thousands of years ago, and that we weren't all dragging our knuckles living in caves together.

ill stop there but i'd just encourage people to start having more productive conversations about culture because arguing about illusory social constructs is only serving to strengthen the hold of the illusory social construct in people's minds aka hustlin' backwards
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,002
Daps
132,749
without consensus on the definition of the term "black" all of this conversation is moot. i guarantee when each individual in this thread says "black" everyone conjures up a different concept of what "black" is. when you ask an individual what their definition of black is, about who they consider black and who they dont, eventually you can break it down to the granular level where we see race as a social construct, and to a degree totally subjective.

the term 'african' is just as misleading. one, the term africa and its etymological origin is highly debated, so we dont really know where this term came from. two, the ancient peoples of africa did not refer to themselves as africans. africa is a modern name. so here we find ourselves again dealing in social constructs of race and culture.

so its not accurate to generalize and say 'black,' and its also not accurate to generalize and say 'african.'

but that being said there are still a lot of misrepresentations in this thread.

the various cultures of what we consider "africa" have had considerable influence on the rest of the world, much more than they're given credit for. thousands of years ago the ancient kingdoms of africa were colonizing what we know today as the middle east, europe, and even into parts of asia.

but even the ancient african cultures had origins in an even more ancient culture, the same culture whose influence is responsible for the family of pyramids that exist throughout the world. but people have a hard time grasping the idea that an advanced culture could have existed tens of thousands of years ago, and that we weren't all dragging our knuckles living in caves together.

ill stop there but i'd just encourage people to start having more productive conversations about culture because arguing about illusory social constructs is only serving to strengthen the hold of the illusory social construct in people's minds aka hustlin' backwards

As the op has already stated, research into the human genome has ethered racial supremacists and bigots of all kind.

DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity. People who have lived in the same geographic region for many generations may have some alleles in common,*but no allele will be found in all members of one population and in no members of any other.In other words, while the concept of separate human sub-species called "races" was developed four hundred years ago, during a time when white supremacists and the slave trade were seeking to justify the enslavement of Blacks, as well as the social, economic and political exaltation of whites, however, the most recent in-depth study of human DNA ever completed has shown that "race" does not exist.

Nobody is superior. Nobody is inferior. Nobody is God/Allah/Yahweh/whoever's chosen people. Nobody is a sub species. Nobody was cursed by Ham or created by Dr. Yacub. Nobody is part of slave race or slavemaster race. Nobody is God. Nobody is the devil. Nobody is defined by the shape of their head.

People need to come off that bullshyt and just accept that we and all living things came from the same primordial DNA and are far more alike than we are different.
 

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
18,756
Reputation
3,935
Daps
53,486
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
How I see it, it's kind of like patriotism and nationalism. Ain't nothing wrong with patriotism (being proud of who you are/knowing your history/"black knowledge"), but it's often on a slippery road that leads to nationalism, extreme or not (saying that you're better than others/they're "devils":shaq2:/"black supremacy"). Also, it simply defies logic when people cry about "White power" and turn around and say "Black power" :heh:

Knowkedge is also being able to acknoweldge shortcomings, errors and bad things that have happened over the years. Problem is, a lot of "pro-black" dudes really seem to believe that EVERYTHING bad is "The White Man's" fault...makes me think of those "Thanks Obama" gifs. We all use scapegoats in order to escape from our own responsibilities, and using the "Blame the white man" card too often meanes that legitimate beefs are brushed off with the nonsense. Like people believe that Africa was some peaceful heaven on Earth before outsiders came in crushing the buildings :aicmon:
 
Top