Obviously sexual access to white hispanic women is the #1 reason these hotep types want to include Puerto Ricans and Mexicans etc, but exclude Black African men (their competition) and Black African women (who they are low key not as attracted to at all)
“We all the same MamiI no African”
nikka’s bout to hit you with a comparison picture of Scottie Pippen and some Native American dude
Pre-Colombian contact is not far fetched at all.
Nor is the idea that maybe a small number of phenotypically African people were here at some point.
The thing is, these nikka’s claiming it aren’t descended from that no way.
All of this shyt is rooted in anti-Africaness, anti-Blackness.
The Africa denial...even Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade denial.
The “indigenous” promotion as well as the Native American dikk riding.
I’ve said it before on here but I’ll say it again. This whole shyt started mainly from Biracial and Triracial African Americans way back in the day either looking to escape the racial discrimination of American society or jockeying for social and economic status within African American communities by claiming other.
These others went by Cherokee, Blackfoot, Choctaw, Melungeon, Black Irish, Lumbee, Black Dutch, Moor, etc etc. Some were free people of color, some were not.
Ask most AA’s who claim Native heritage and I guarantee the tribe will change 3-4 times depending on which relative is telling the history.
Ask most AA’s about an Native ancestor and I damn near guarantee that ancestor looks mulatto.
Ask most AA’s about an Native ancestor and often times you’ll hear how they were mixed with “Indian and Irish” for example. All vague shyt.
And btw, White folks in the south do that Native claim too to deny their African ancestor’s who passed. That “my grandma was a Cherokee princess” shyt.
when did i ever say i believed or advocated for that theory?
im not about to hit him with anything my man.nikka’s bout to hit you with a comparison picture of Scottie Pippen and some Native American dude
once again my man, i don't care about specifcs theories nor am i here to debate.
Here yall go with DA WHITE MAN!! No credible BLACK scholar, historian, archaeologist or anthropologist has come forth and found limited evidence to even make this a theory. They done a WAY better job for the Olmecs than this. Van Sertima while dated was a credible scholar. Show me a credible scholar who has provided evidence for this theory.
Look up what the word "theory" means because you keep using it incorrect. You can't follow up on something that has no evidence for its foundation. Thats how theories work. And hardly any theory was "cac created" they come from primary sources for the most part. You read what the primary source tells to come up with your OWN theory. For example the Romans mention dark skinned people living in an area around Russia/Caucasus region. We can then THEORIZE that the people in that region back then were much darker than before.
bro i just sat here and told you i dont give a fukk about what you're talking about.
And no one gives a fukk about what you're saying. You told people that we should entertain any theory because of cac's meddling. We told you that theories NEED evidence to be consideres theories and now you're running away from your statements.
my nikka, why are you still trying to debate?
