Black people, we're not Africans! Here's two reasons...

[im_sleep]

Obviously access to white hispanics women is the #1 reason.

“We all the same Mami I no African”

 

[AndroidHero]

It was a dumb thread, good thing the mods locked it and throw it in the bushes.

 

[im_sleep]

Soooo I don't think I ever heard of this theory btw?

So the theory is that blks were here before slavery or is it that blks were the original indigenous tribes in areas other than Africa? Proof?
How'd I miss this theory?

I mean it seems far-fetched with the whole genetics shyt, but the entire field of archaeology IS heavily entrenched in Eurocentrism and historical cover ups to support whitewashed narratives.

What's the basis for this line of reasoning? It's tempting especially when u see so many brown indigenous tribes of people worldwide.

When u read shyt like this in the Taipei Times In honor of the Little Black People - Taipei Times

It does kinda make u wonder. I think what may have happened was that all migration patterns came out of Africa, so some sub-Saharan phenotypically blk migration patterns could have settled in numerous parts around the world. However, climate changes and intermixing with later groups and of course annihilation and/or genocide or assimilation into tribes might've left us with the aboriginals and indigenous tribes u see today unless they were relatively untouched by other cultures like people's on Andaman Islands.
If Asia can have phenotypic blk indigenous tribes still present today, it's not too far fetched to imagine similar blk tribes alongside N. American tribes---which explains the variance U see in early European explorers depictions of natives. Some look like traditional Natives and others look strangely more phenotypically sub-saharan.

I'm always interested in a good conspiracy theory and never put covering up the past beyond the scope of whites. Lmao!

Pre-Colombian contact is not far fetched at all.
Nor is the idea that maybe a small number of phenotypically African people were here at some point.

The thing is, these nikka’s claiming it aren’t descended from that no way.

All of this shyt is rooted in anti-Africaness, anti-Blackness.

The Africa denial...even Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade denial.


The “indigenous” promotion as well as the Native American dikk riding.

I’ve said it before on here but I’ll say it again. This whole shyt started mainly from Biracial and Triracial African Americans way back in the day either looking to escape the racial discrimination of American society or jockeying for social and economic status within African American communities by claiming other.

These others went by Cherokee, Blackfoot, Choctaw, Melungeon, Black Irish, Lumbee, Black Dutch, Moor, etc etc. Some were free people of color, some were not.

Ask most AA’s who claim Native heritage and I guarantee the tribe will change 3-4 times depending on which relative is telling the history.


Ask most AA’s about an Native ancestor and I damn near guarantee that ancestor looks mulatto.


Ask most AA’s about an Native ancestor and often times you’ll hear how they were mixed with “Indian and Irish” for example. All vague shyt.

And btw, White folks in the south do that Native claim too to deny their African ancestor’s who passed. That “my grandma was a Cherokee princess” shyt.

 

[BmoreGorilla]

You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain




Hope you paying attention @BmoreGorilla

I for one liked the thread

 

[SupremexKing]

Yeah I've noticed that. His philosophy is African American is the true tribe and every other one doesn't matter. Which makes no fukking sense . I tried talking about, moors, Egyptians, ethnic tribes, isrealites, kingdom of mali etc but some people on here act the fukk up. Aint no such thing as the color black.

all that stuff is largely irrelevant.

what does any of that do to dismantle white supremacy?

 

[Dzali OG]

@Poitier and @BlackPearl The Empress
Promise I ain't tryin to start fukkery, but the chemistry between ya'll is high-key amazing!

Jump on that for the culture pls. The babies would be adorable! But @Poitier i hear @BlackPearl The Empress got a donk. So if ya'll have daughters, u gon have to refine that Dempsey Roll to deal with the savages in the streets.

On another note, am I missing something here?

@BlackPearl The Empress you packin some leg quarters?

 

[Majestic]

all that stuff is largely irrelevant.

what does any of that do to dismantle white supremacy?

Once you know your true heritage everything becomes easier.

 

[SupremexKing]

Once you know your true heritage everything becomes easier.

sure, but does it matter currently?

once again, how does you knowing you are or aren't a hebrew israelite dismantling white supremacy?

 

[SupremexKing]

If any of you Hotep gang nikkas want to talk about race with me, I have a little free time before UM/MSU


I don't argue based on phenotype so save the images of Melanesians and South Asians

exploring other scientific racial theories besides the onces put forth by cacs doesn't make you a hotep.

 

[Dzali OG]

Soooo I don't think I ever heard of this theory btw?

So the theory is that blks were here before slavery or is it that blks were the original indigenous tribes in areas other than Africa? Proof?
How'd I miss this theory?

I mean it seems far-fetched with the whole genetics shyt, but the entire field of archaeology IS heavily entrenched in Eurocentrism and historical cover ups to support whitewashed narratives.

What's the basis for this line of reasoning? It's tempting especially when u see so many brown indigenous tribes of people worldwide.

When u read shyt like this in the Taipei Times In honor of the Little Black People - Taipei Times

It does kinda make u wonder. I think what may have happened was that all migration patterns came out of Africa, so some sub-Saharan phenotypically blk migration patterns could have settled in numerous parts around the world. However, climate changes and intermixing with later groups and of course annihilation and/or genocide or assimilation into tribes might've left us with the aboriginals and indigenous tribes u see today unless they were relatively untouched by other cultures like people's on Andaman Islands.
If Asia can have phenotypic blk indigenous tribes still present today, it's not too far fetched to imagine similar blk tribes alongside N. American tribes---which explains the variance U see in early European explorers depictions of natives. Some look like traditional Natives and others look strangely more phenotypically sub-saharan.

I'm always interested in a good conspiracy theory and never put covering up the past beyond the scope of whites. Lmao!

The theory is actually common sense if you think about it. All it's saying is that black people are indigenous on every continent.

Since blacks are indeed the first peoples on the planet, why were we only in Africa? Take into account the time when it was basically one big land mass.

I guess the key is rather a person acknowledges black people have been here millions of years, or they go with the cac teaching concerning "modern man" which is their code for cacs.

Also, every race will admit, sometimes with some arm twisting, that their ancestors in whatever land they live in (China) were black. A simple deduction leads you to, black people were first and indigenous everywhere.

Now here's where the checker players lose in chess: If we're indigenous everywhere, why are the nomadic native americans touted and paid as if they're the only ones wronged? Some of them Indians teamed up with eurocacs to enslave us.

 

[Poitier]

exploring other scientific racial theories besides the onces put forth by cacs doesn't make you a hotep.

Theories with no evidence of any sort, scientific or archeological, aren't theories.

 

[SupremexKing]

Theories with no evidence of any sort, scientific or archeological, aren't theories.

well there is plenty of evidence.

for something to be a theory doesn't require anything you listed either.

thats why its a theory and not empirical fact.

 

[InfinateOpulance]

Man y’all need to find some hobbies.

But the coli is my hobby

 

[Poitier]

well there is plenty of evidence.

Post ANY evidence of AAs being a completely separate group of people than Africans whether that be archeological evidence, DNA evidence, historical testimonies....anything.

 

[Bawon Samedi]

exploring other scientific racial theories besides the onces put forth by cacs doesn't make you a hotep.

Africans possibly reaching the Americas before Columbus IS a theory. Because we actually have documented evidence from a written text from an Arab saying that Mansa Musa's brother sailed across the Atlantic during the middle ages. Among many other evidence. That is a solid theory. Now AAs being some long lost Native American tribe distant from Africans is just some crackhead shyt. I should not even call it hotep shyt.