Black people, we're not Africans! Here's two reasons...

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,377
Once again? Who are you talking to?

and Race? there is only one race or are you seriously borderline retarded?

Clearly, I wasted my time with you get lost.

I'm talking to your dumb ass :pachaha:


Quote an article (not a peer reviewed science journal) saying the early American descendants were probably Melanesians (which falls in line with the "cac" out of Africa theory) because the skulls are similar (using skulls to classify people is ironically a cac invented science) :pachaha:

The funny thing is AAs look NOTHING like Melanesians. We are on average much taller, much leaner/athletically built, we don't get blonde hair, we don't get blue eyes, so on and so on. Smart dumb nikka shyt.
 

im_sleep

Superstar
Joined
Jan 29, 2017
Messages
2,859
Reputation
1,324
Daps
15,227
im not about to hit him with anything my man.

if you nikkas had basic reading comprehension you would see im not advocating for any specific racial theory, just saying we shouldn't knock it just because it wasn't created by cacs.
Save the condescension, I been hearing these kind of theories and ideologies since I was knee high. I know enough to have my reasons to discredit it.
:beli:

Besides the anti-African slant of this whole theory is cac-influenced anyway if you wanna go there.
:yeshrug:
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,412
Reputation
15,439
Daps
246,377
Seen that study and doesn't prove anything but instead hurts this argument even more.

People keep bringing up "blacks" in Australia, Andaman Islands, Southeast Asia and the Pacific without realizing that those "blacks" are extremely distant from Africans AND blacks of the Diaspora(AAs). They're more distant to blacks than damn Western Eurasians(Middle Easterners and Europeans) on the human tree.

He really posted that like it was bombshell :mjlol::dead:
 

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
14,798
Reputation
2,533
Daps
40,993
Reppin
Duval Florida
Obviously sexual access to white hispanic women is the #1 reason these hotep types want to include Puerto Ricans and Mexicans etc, but exclude Black African men (their competition) and Black African women (who they are low key not as attracted to at all)

“We all the same Mami :mjpls:I no African”

Well I don't include them...

It's a mistake by Hebrew Israelites trying to find the tribes and seeing no one else assume the mexicans, indians, etc., are those tribes. When in reality their brothers were killed and eaten by those groups and are extinct.
 

Mugenight

B3-3vil-2-3vil
Joined
Apr 4, 2015
Messages
1,689
Reputation
-535
Daps
5,491
Seen that study and doesn't prove anything but instead hurts this argument even more.

People keep bringing up "blacks" in Australia, Andaman Islands, Southeast Asia and the Pacific without realizing that those "blacks" are extremely distant from Africans AND blacks of the Diaspora(AAs). They're more distant to blacks than damn Western Eurasians(Middle Easterners and Europeans) on the human tree.

Are you fukking with me right now?

Or have you not simply been paying attention?

Which one is it?
I'm talking to your dumb ass :pachaha:


Quote an article (not a peer reviewed science journal) saying the early American descendants were probably Melanesians (which falls in line with the "cac" out of Africa theory) because the skulls are similar (using skulls to classify people is ironically a cac invented science) :pachaha:

The funny thing is AAs look NOTHING like Melanesians. We are on average much taller, much leaner/athletically built, we don't get blonde hair, we don't get blue eyes, so on and so on. Smart dumb nikka shyt.

Apparently, you don't understand English. We have nothing else to talk about.
 

Mugenight

B3-3vil-2-3vil
Joined
Apr 4, 2015
Messages
1,689
Reputation
-535
Daps
5,491
:dwillhuh: huh, that's not what I'm saying.

That's why it's a loaded question.


They dont realize their "theory" died before it can even take root. That SAME article he posted was the one that put the nail in its coffin. LMAO!

I posted the whole article so you can read it and form your own opinion nothing more nothing less.

My problem with you and people like you is simple you have no intention having any legitimate form of dialogue your mind is already made up and you just wanna disagree and go off on emotional tangents about Anti-Africanism which is not the intention of anyone having this discussion.
 
Last edited:

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
14,798
Reputation
2,533
Daps
40,993
Reppin
Duval Florida
Wish rep was back on. These folks need to come clean. This Native American shyt is just a way for those types to be exotic or to explain away their European admixture. The ironic thing is these types know next to NOTHING about Native American culture/history. And the go to Native tribe is always Cherokee. That is how you can tell.

But certain Biracials and Triracials feel they are not "black enough" and so ALL AAs must be "distant" from Africans. They try to speak as representations for AAs. I have no problems with Biracials but those types need to stop acting like they are ambassadors for AAs just like very dark skinned AAs should not either(who claim dark skin=pure black).

You guys are really dense...

Who wants to be a mongroid native american? :scust:
 

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
14,798
Reputation
2,533
Daps
40,993
Reppin
Duval Florida
Here yall go with DA WHITE MAN!! No credible BLACK scholar, historian, archaeologist or anthropologist has come forth and found limited evidence to even make this a theory. They done a WAY better job for the Olmecs than this. Van Sertima while dated was a credible scholar. Show me a credible scholar who has provided evidence for this theory.

Dr. Ben...

Who do you think the Olmecs were?
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,497
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
Are you fukking with me right now?

Or have you not simply been paying attention?

Which one is it?


Nah just that your argument got blown apart. Let me add some more.
TGIcq.jpg


Look at how genetically DISTANT black Papuans, Australians and even South Amerindians are from Africans on the human tree. Those people who first settled South America like the article states would have been genetically distant from both Africans and people of the Diaspora(AAs).

Yall can stop with the "do yall have reading comprehension!?" or "Stop defending cac science!" nonsense now.
 

Dzali OG

Dz Ali OG...Pay me like you owe me!
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
14,798
Reputation
2,533
Daps
40,993
Reppin
Duval Florida
This "cac" and "eurocentric" trope yall keep repeating is odd since I've never said Europeans are the only source of truth?

I'm down to entertain anything with evidence backing it and so far the "AAs are not Africans but aboriginal Americans" have produced none.

American aboriginals
European aboriginals
African aboriginals

Does that make it easier? Of course we're all one...just on different continents. Though the Australian aboriginal is extremely compromised with cac genes.
 
Top