Soooo I don't think I ever heard of this theory btw?
So the theory is that blks were here before slavery or is it that blks were the original indigenous tribes in areas other than Africa? Proof?
How'd I miss this theory?
I mean it seems far-fetched with the whole genetics shyt, but the entire field of archaeology IS heavily entrenched in Eurocentrism and historical cover ups to support whitewashed narratives.
What's the basis for this line of reasoning? It's tempting especially when u see so many brown indigenous tribes of people worldwide.
When u read shyt like this in the Taipei Times
In honor of the Little Black People - Taipei Times
It does kinda make u wonder. I think what may have happened was that all migration patterns came out of Africa, so some sub-Saharan phenotypically blk migration patterns could have settled in numerous parts around the world. However, climate changes and intermixing with later groups and of course annihilation and/or genocide or assimilation into tribes might've left us with the aboriginals and indigenous tribes u see today unless they were relatively untouched by other cultures like people's on Andaman Islands.
If Asia can have phenotypic blk indigenous tribes still present today, it's not too far fetched to imagine similar blk tribes alongside N. American tribes---which explains the variance U see in early European explorers depictions of natives. Some look like traditional Natives and others look strangely more phenotypically sub-saharan.
I'm always interested in a good conspiracy theory and never put covering up the past beyond the scope of whites. Lmao!