He shouldn’t have shot her.
She was not a threat, and his car is a material thing that can be replaced.
He deserves the murder charge
Should have just taken out the tires.
He shouldn’t have shot her.
She was not a threat, and his car is a material thing that can be replaced.
He deserves the murder charge
Should have just taken out the tires.
He’ll probably plead down.
any responsible gun owner, know that once the culprit is running or driving away; u have to stop shooting at them.
fukked up law, but it is the law.
I’m just consistent. Shooting someone that’s running away from you is always wrong. No matter what color the shooter or victim is
.A decent lawyer should be able to get him off.
if even think about running over a cop / using your vehicle as a deadly weapon then they’re fully justified to shoot so I don’t see why the same doesn’t apply here.
Not if they violated, it's not like you get training for situations like this.I’m just consistent. Shooting someone that’s running away from you is always wrong. No matter what color the shooter or victim is
Can't take life over property. Now if she had a weapon that would be a different story
she tried to run him over with the v...that doesn't count as a deadly weapon?Can't take life over property. Now if she had a weapon that would be a different story