PlainSight
Anon
well if i'm wrong, i'd like you to break it down for me. i think we're all looking at patriarchy differently. y'all see it as one big collective, where as i see teams. you could try to dismantle "white patriarchy", but you'll still have to deal with asian patriarchy, indian, arab, hispanic patriarchy.
and black women are going to have to realize that women of other races may talk a good game, but they arent going to try to dismantle their patriarchal structure.
Didn't say you were wrong, just said I don't agree. I could be the one who is wrong!
Women are likely to see it as one big collective: men. So if I try to defy my autistic diagnosis and be empathetic for a moment, I'd imagine that - despite what you say about them "talking a big game", that feminists would rather dismantle the patriarchal structure of all the races. The thing is, as men, we are conditioned over many years to uphold patriarchal values, so of course we are going to naturally oppose feminism, whether women are being subjugated or not. And we are chastised if we don't.
I can't tell you the amount of times I've been called a "white knight" recently just because I didn't think there was any harm in listening to the concerns of feminists and seeing where there can be some alleviation. Now, I understand that you think the alleviation is patriarchy, but that's of course not going to be so from the POV of feminists. They are going to want the freedom to be in charge, or do something that is not considered "feminine", or be gay, or not to be dominated by men, or even to actually be a man (trans).
I think we can come to a conclusion about economic principle and political strength without alienating or submitting our women to a secondary role that a growing number of them don't want. There are other concerns that they may have too that are less talked about. But that's pretty much how I'm looking at it, at least if I try to be subjective and view it from the woman's POV. My own objective view is that there doesn't need to be a patriarchy or a matriarchy. And the feminists that I have known (particularly one I went on a few dates with) are the same too, they are more egalitarian in nature. But they also described themselves as "third wave", which is different.
That makes sense to me - not all feminists believe in the exact same shyt as it is a collection of ideologies rather than a hive minded view. If we're gonna uplift black people then we do all have to be on the same page - whether they're gay, feminist, Christian, Muslim, Atheist etc.