steadyrighteous
Veteran
I don't necessarily agree with you but I really like how you articulated your point. Unlike some you have definitely given it a thorough listen and decided it's not for you.
KRIT is in a weird place and has been since he got in the game. I think he has constantly shown growth, but it has been a gradual change and not a complete 180. Because he has never completely switched up from his core themes that got him to the dance per se, a lot of people have made the observation that he comes off as repetitive.
Not being argumentative or contrarian, but what do you think he could or should have done with this release that would have gotten your attention as a big KRIT fan?
The shortest, honest answer is - I don't know. But I can give you an example or a slightly more detailed assessment that explains my perspective on the idea of KRIT being "repetitive".
This isn't a comparison between them as artists and I'm not saying KRIT should be like him in any way, but take Kendrick as an example. (In a perfect world, I think a perfect KRIT album would be slightly above a perfect Kendrick album - just wanted to let that be known so this doesn't seem like I'm stanning or trying to start a comparison lol)
GKMC, TPaB and DAMN are three different albums. Ignore the sound, ignore the style, but focus on the central thesis behind each one:
GKMC - Where I'm From and how I grew up (local)
TPaB - Society today and where we are as a whole (external)
DAMN - Who I am and what I'm feeling (internal)
Again, ignore the style of the beats and production and focus on what the topics are - Money Trees from GKMC would feel completely out of place on TPaB or DAMN. Feel from DAMN might fit on TPaB, but probably wouldn't on GKMC. DNA from DAMN couldn't possibly be on TPaB, but might fit on GKMC. For arguments sake, Swimming Pools from GKMC would fit fine on DAMN, but not on TPaB, but that's just to help make my point on perspective.
The point I'm trying to illustrate is, when you switch perspective, or the general theme you're attacking, your entire writing process shifts and it doesn't fit what you did before.
Now let's go back one album with KRIT. Cadillactica, which I thought was good, but let's take two songs that immediately spring to mind for me - the title track, Cadillactica, and Soul Food with Raphael Saadiq. Both songs I really like.
Cadillactica the song, could easily slot into the KRIT portion of 4eva Is a Mighty Long Time or replace Confetti (which I like) and you wouldn't miss a beat. Soul Food would feel right at home on the Justin Scott portion of the album between any two tracks or replacing let's say, the Jill Scott joint.
So if 2 songs you made from your previous album could go on your new one, or vice versa - what's the difference?
Listening to 4eva, there isn't a single bad song on there. Nothing is weak. Nothing is wack. But if I'm in the mood for KRIT, why would I listen to a 3/5 version when he has a couple of 4/5 and maybe even a 5/5 versions of the same feeling, vibe and topics?
If the core of an artist remains the same, it doesn't matter what the question is, whether it be "do you believe in aliens" or "what do you think about the Lakers", the answer will feel like them, because their core is strong.
KRIT just needs to start asking himself some different questions because I feel like I've heard 5 answers to the same 5 questions at this point.