This in itself you have to be ok with. I posted a certain egyptian parable that explains the drawbacks to written language but its not an obvious parable:
https://www.thecoli.com/posts/41076621/
that said you have to truly believe Jesus' perspective of the Bible to read what I am showing you. The reason I say this is because if you take "traditional" approaches you will already have lost
remember, Heaven and Earth were declared...meaning it is finished. Everything that follows is a reinterpretation...or should I say retelling of something already uttered.
Once you recognize this, the pattern of God will emerge to you. You will also understand the fundamental fallacy of additions to scripture whether they be Christian/Muslim/Jewish/Gnostic etc...
All organized religions for the most part are wrong to some degree because of their nature (control).
But breh. The bolded is what you are trying to say. That's explicit and easy to follow. That should've been said first - as it provides direction, and then I could follow everything else you said before that. Because until I got to that last sentence, I couldn't put together what you were trying to say.
You are burying your perspective under a lot of stuff that is hard to follow.
If you're going East, say that you're going East and then give the "why"
You don't say make a left on this road, travel four miles, then turn right, stop, count four steps backwards, then do an about face, then travel two miles.
This gives no context. And it puts one in the position to get wrapped up in the details without seeing the bigger picture.
State what the destination is first so we can put everything else into context.