so the guy killing in movies should make millions, while the live saver work for free...
I just dont get it
Bayer CEO: "We did not make this medicine for Indians…we made it for Westerners who can afford it"
- Thread starter Julius Skrrvin
- Start date
I just dont get it
mbewane
Knicks: 93 til infinity
so the guy killing in movies should make millions, while the live saver work for free...
I just dont get it
Oh I thought you meant protecting movies as we protect medecine, my bad.
In that case I agree, but you can extend that to doctors, nurses, teachers and so on, and then we get back to the whole public/private thing...
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
We didnt make this to help the poor we made it to rip people off.
Its so demonic, friends.
Its so demonic, friends.
You think the guy with stage 4 cancer who ends up living feels ripped off?We didnt make this to help the poor we made it to rip people off.
Its so demonic, friends.
i'm beginning to think there maybe some confusion as to what the drug is for, and what it does to warrant the cost...
Mr. Somebody
Friend Of A Friend
If a mans on fire im sure he'll sign over his estate for a bucket of water, friend.You think the guy with stage 4 cancer who ends up living feels ripped off?
You think the guy with stage 4 cancer who ends up living feels ripped off?
I'm sure you'd change your tune if you needed it and couldn't afford it
It's easy to sit here and talk about how it's not overpriced and R&D costs need to be recouped and all that other nonsense when you're perfectly healthy
The profit motive speeds up the rate of innovation, and the lives saved by the introduction of this product must hold some value right?I'm sure you'd change your tune if you needed it and couldn't afford it
It's easy to sit here and talk about how it's not overpriced and R&D costs need to be recouped and all that other nonsense when you're perfectly healthy
By removing the profit motive you condemn them to death. Wheres the "if it saves one person its worth it" zeal at?
Unless you can show that this drug would be available now without the profit incentive...
Its just a shytty trade off
The profit motive speeds up the rate of innovation, and the lives saved by the introduction of this product must hold some value right?
By removing the profit motive you condemn them to death. Wheres the "if it saves one person its worth it" zeal at?
Unless you can show that this drug would be available now without the profit incentive...
Its just a shytty trade off
Like I said, you wouldn't have this mindset if YOU were sick and couldn't afford it, clear lack of basic human empathy
Tax payer money funds most R&D, there's a reason the Drug industry blocks congress from auditing R&D costs, but hey free market blah blah blah.
would you feel the same if it didnt?Like I said, you wouldn't have this mindset if YOU were sick and couldn't afford it, clear lack of basic human empathy
Tax payer money funds most R&D, there's a reason the Drug industry blocks congress from auditing R&D costs, but hey free market blah blah blah.
It does, so throw the if's in the bushes
Just askin cause you threw out the "free market blah blah blah", immediately after referencing govt. intervention... Just trying to figure out where you stand.I'll assume your on the emotional side.
I'll assume your on the emotional side.
I stand with my fellow man
I'll assume you're dead on the inside
Not sure if this is your standard go to line but I'm a fan of your work. I may have to steal this every now and then. I think 14 out 15 threads in TLR can be responded to with "Some people just want to burn in the fires of hell breh" and get 20 daps each time.
as long as you post with my quote that is fine brother. Peace be with you.
This cac looks familiar.....
Nathaniel Rothschild
Jacob Rothschild
Yeah that's not Dekker last name. He is a Rothschild.