What about that shyt is objectively worth 110 million?
Where did I say anything about money? Fiat money is only as valuable as the people agreeing to the transaction.
What about that shyt is objectively worth 110 million?
Where did I say anything about money? Fiat money is only as valuable as the people agreeing to the transaction.
You didn't. I asked you.
What about that shyt is objectively worth $110 million.
Like what? Scarcity often determines value and if that is the metric then you should be complaining about waaaaaay more than just a fukking painting.
Nah.
I can't think of anything with less intrinsic value that someone would pay such an exorbitant amount for.
Diamonds. That was pretty easy. With a painting, you are getting a one of one that actually took labor and will appreciate in value. Diamonds only have value from dirt because they are artificially inflated.
nikkas grew up with bullshyt like this on their wall this why they have such a limited view on paintings
It was implied by you and other individuals. Which is simply an assumption is it not?
And what exactly did I lie about?
I'll wait....
Everything I wrote is in plain view. However you perceive it, is on you and you alone.
Telling me that I could have had a normal, respectful opinion, then giving me an example of said opinion is YOU once again trying to put your opinion on ME.
It's over breh. I'm not you. I stated what I wanted to say and I'm not apologizing for it.
Simple question
What makes these painting any less "Art" than a Basquait piece?
nikkas grew up with bullshyt like this on their wall this why they have such a limited view on paintings
It meant whatever you think sir. Good day.So what did you mean by that comment?
You sound like a cac with that post....
Bruh, I have 2 Associate's Degrees in Art and a Bachelor's in Graphic Design. I've taken more Art History classes than most on here combined, so there isn't a period or style of art that I haven't had to study. I worked at the Nelson-Atkins Museum, considered one of the best in the country. In art, there's no such thing as better because all art is subjective, I was showing you the influences on Basquiat's style. That primitive, abstract expressionist style that artists in the 70s-80s were doing and getting rich off of it.Cool paintings but Im not seeing anything that makes it better than Basquiat.
Some of yall confuse "coherence" and "realistic paintings" with better which shows a lack of art theory.
The same people who probably think nikkas like Kendrick and J Cole are legends but Future and Young Thug are wack even though the latter are better at doing what they do.