Maybe so at that last paragraph.
Put your knowledge to test. Your free to choose which art piece(s) of his and break it down.
I'm entirely too lazy to do this. But this does sounds like a good idea for a personal project. Maybe.
Could it also be that he was high on heroin? His painting high or sober, does it make a difference and does it get the same breakdown?
What, on earth, does that change for a professional artist? The artist himself is a part of the art. I dont want to say heroin/drugs enhances but it opens the artist in a way. Though I want to say a true artist doesnt rely on drugs but thats a whole different philosophical debate on channeling higher dimensions of the brain.
There is also antoher artist that painted self protraits under the influence of many drugs.
As for drug use and professional critique....depends on the quality of the artist, IMO. You get drunk and apply sloppy skills means much less than if you smoke heroin in an art house as one of the most prominent artists of your time... thats a bit different.
Bro, don't bother. You are talking to people who were brought up to think the more realism = better.
You're exactly right. Art teaches us to look beyond the base, the obvious. To use our intuitions, empathy and sensitivity to partake in a deeper, richer reality. A doorway to deeper dimensions.
Reminds me of the concept of the movie They Live.
Anyways, I may be mistaken but wasnt his [Basquiate's] earlier art less abstract?
Last edited: