Basically Kamala Harris political career is dead after January.

Uachet

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
5,426
Reputation
4,237
Daps
31,711
Reppin
Black Self-Sufficiency
Go back and watch her interviews and townhall meetings. Listen closely to what she says and how she says it in response to questions given her. Now, while you do that, imagine it is a Republican man giving those answers. I am pretty sure you all would then see just how poorly she conducted herself during this run. I am of the opinion that many of you are looking through some very biased lenses, and so can't see that she was not connecting with the majority of the electorate at all.

I voted for her. I knew what I was voting for and held my nose and still voted for her, because I wanted the courts, especially the Supreme Court, to be more balanced with Liberal Judges. It is too far Conservative at the moment, and that is not good for the Nation. Still, even with that being the case, I could easily see just how poorly she was doing when exposed to questions and how much they were trying to protect her from any oppositional questioning, because even they knew she was not great at giving concise answers. The only thing she could really talk emphatically about was Abortion. Every other issue asked about received a synonym laced word salad answer, that even had Oprah side-eyeing her.

I felt overall this election would be determined by whether White Women viewed Abortion Rights more important than the high cost of necessities. When it came to polling on the issue, it showed that most people felt more confident in Trump's handling of the economy than Harris. While most people felt more confident in Harris' position on Abortion Rights than Trump's. Unfortunately for Harris, when it came to White Women, a slight majority (52%) were more concerned about the high cost of eggs than they were about the ability to abort a fertilized egg. So she could not even convince the very women she needed to win, White Women, to vote for her in mass. Something the Democrats were so sure would happen.
 

ALonelyDad

Veteran
Joined
Jan 20, 2015
Messages
74,533
Reputation
8,909
Daps
328,964
I am not sure I buy the Obama and Nancy didn't want her, if they didn't want her then they should have let it ride out with Biden because what was going to be their plan wanting Biden to drop out with 3 months left?? Getting a completely new nominee not close to Biden would have been a bigger disaster.
 

CM_Burns

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,591
Reputation
-219
Daps
32,021
Reppin
NULL
Just losing an election doesn't mean you can't continue to be a senator (Romney, McCain), but if that's true about the donors then she could be out
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
43,863
Reputation
5,033
Daps
135,661
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
I am not sure I buy the Obama and Nancy didn't want her, if they didn't want her then they should have let it ride out with Biden because what was going to be their plan wanting Biden to drop out with 3 months left?? Getting a completely new nominee not close to Biden would have been a bigger disaster.
Nancy has always dodged accountability and tried to place blame on others for their failures. She did the same thing years ago when she had Clyburn on TV speaking out against Progressives.
 

FukkaPaidEmail

Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
22,909
Reputation
4,053
Daps
88,263
Reppin
The Diaspora
I am not sure I buy the Obama and Nancy didn't want her, if they didn't want her then they should have let it ride out with Biden because what was going to be their plan wanting Biden to drop out with 3 months left?? Getting a completely new nominee not close to Biden would have been a bigger disaster.
It’s believable because the whole world saw her democratic primary campaign ended by fukking Tulsi Gabbard.

nobody who knows what they are talking about is gonna look at that …see how she really didn’t anything as VP and say Kamala Harris will be the next president .

If Obama could tell his man Biden he ain’t have it in 2016 I’m sure that he wouldn’t have a problem saying how he felt about Kamala .
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
43,863
Reputation
5,033
Daps
135,661
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
It’s believable because the whole world saw her democratic primary campaign ended by fukking Tulsi Gabbard.

nobody who knows what they are talking about is gonna look at that …see how she really didn’t anything as VP and say Kamala Harris will be the next president .

If Obama could tell his man Biden he ain’t have it in 2016 I’m sure that he wouldn’t have a problem saying how he felt about Kamala .
The problem with that is the narrative was out there including from multiple people on this site that Harris had the best chance to win considering that she was already near the position and the fact the money already raised had to be use it or lose it.

It’s disingenuous to pivot that narrative now
 
Top