Azealia Banks Roasts Christianity

[Medicate]

They like to cherry-pick, just like slavemasters did since the text also states things like this....​

This is why slaves were not allowed to read and weren't actually taught 'Christianity'. It was like teaching them mathematics by showing them 2 + 2, but never showing them what the result of the operation was.​

You're trolling very slickly here. That is not why the slaves were not allowed to read and write..........They were not taught how to read and write and made to speak English AND Taught Christianity in order to subdue communication between the slaves and enhance Obedience. We had our own dialect and faith, which is what helped us communicate. Did you not know that slave mothers and their children were separated from each other not just because, but because late at night the slave mothers were caught teaching their children our language from back home and our beliefs and traditions, so they would kill or separate them. It was all part of the "conditioning", to continue the cycle of slave obedience...now fast forward till today.the same exact thing is happening.

The slave masters knew we would try and communicate to try and rebel. They knew the type slaves they were getting, were from warrior tribes who would resist at any moment, so they had to strip your language and teach us a form of "Christ" that is "loving", which "softens" the heart....OF A WARRIOR, which is exactly what it did, before long all the slaves were waiting on "Jesus" therefore the amount of resistance was subdued and slaves conditioned to OBEY either by WILL or FORCE, just as you see today.......IN RELIGION..

 

[pickles]

Negroe we would still be in slavery if it wasn't for their resort to colonization of the motherland. Marching our soles through the ground is not what stopped them from making us drink from "colored" fountains only...It was MONEY....They need us more than they tell you they do.......... Which is why they LOVE MLK instead Prince Malcolm. X was on a movement that would destabilize and bring Amerikkka to justice. MLK was on Peace with Amerikkka, which means the powers could get more use out of us.........

This is also why the higher up whites behind the scenes in the government backed "Integration", because it brought more negroe LABOR into their capitalist machine....they had to grant these things in order to be able to suck our communities dry, along with the fact they had already built up their capitalist machine. They needed more LABOR, which means more "INTEGRATION" The cacs that run shyt behind the scenes could careless about their racist lower level brethren....

The main aim is for them to continue to use Black people as fodder and guinea pigs, but you all are so far in outer space, you don't recognize shyt when it is staring you in the face.

:wowwow2: Breh who gets it. I knew there were some smart brehs that post here.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Negroe we would still be in slavery if it wasn't for their resort to colonization of the motherland.

This is stupid. The first slaves brought over here (European and African) were FREED after a few years, given land/money or went back to Africa/Europe.

It wasn't until 1667 (160 years AFTER the trade started) that slavery was imposed on African slaves for LIFE in Virginia.

As far as your 'argument' about money, it was far cheaper to keep us as slaves (since we worked for FREE) than to give us freedom.

Your entire post is emotional nonsense devoid of logic.​

 

[Medicate]

No, as a matter of fact since he was a 'modalist'.​

Great escape.........

 

[Another Man]

**FIXED**​

Be yoked up by white supremacy brehs

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

You're trolling very slickly here. That is not why the slaves were not allowed to read and write..........They were not taught how to read and write and made to speak English AND Taught Christianity in order to subdue communication between the slaves and enhance Obedience.

False. They were taught to read/write up until 1667 when slavery was imposed on Africans FOR LIFE. For 160 years prior, they could do both. It wasn't until the 19th Century that 'White' clergymen began preaching the 'White' man's version of cherry-picked Scriptures.......

http://www.pbs.org/wnet/slavery/experience/religion/history2.html​

As late as 1800 most slaves in the U.S. had not been converted to Christianity. In the years that followed, however, widespread Protestant Evangelicalism, emphasizing individual freedom and direct communication with God, brought about the first large-scale conversion of enslaved men and women. At first, itinerant ministers, captivating large audiences at revivals and camp meetings across the North and South during the middle part of the century, reached only a small percentage of the slave population with their calls to Christianity. Larger numbers of black men and women were converted during the resurgence and intensification of revivalism during the Second Great Awakening of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. At that time, Baptist and Methodist ministers appealed to the slave and free black populations, preaching a plain-styled message of hope and redemption while also catering to manners of worship that African men and women carried with them to America, including spirit possession, call-and-response singing, shouting, and dancing.

Whereas an earlier generation of evangelical preachers had opposed slavery in the South during the early nineteenth century, Protestant clergymen began to defend the institution, invoking a Christian hierarchy in which slaves were bound to obey their masters. For many slaveholders, this outlook not only made evangelical Christianity more palatable, but also provided a strong argument for converting slaves and establishing biracial churches.

Sit your historically ignorant ass down.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Be yoked up by white supremacy brehs

Believe the 'White' man's version of your history instead of learning it for yourself, brehs.
​

 

[Chris.B]

can she criticize Islam like that?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

And how is dat any different from what I just said? It was done to maintain white supremacy like I stated, nikka.

Because, you stupid fukk, by using religion the 'White' man couldn't justify using force against us since we were peacefully defiant.

I'm not a 'n1kka'. THAT'S 'White' supremacy you're spouting.

Go back and view the edited post.



​

 

[Medicate]

 

[iBrowse]

@bdizzle

I got that book by the way.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

:wowwow2: Breh who gets it. I knew there were some smart brehs that post here.

If you think that's 'smart', you're retarded. What makes more sense: Keeping us slaves to work for free while ALL the profits go to THEM, or, giving us freedom so they'd have to pay us, give us housing/food/clothing/resources thereby cutting into their profits considerably?

Before you answer, think about all the 'Black' men in prison working for less than a dollar a day.

Log-off and read a damned book.​

 

[OG_StankBrefs]

Because, you stupid fukk, by using religion the 'White' man couldn't justify using force against us since we were peacefully defiant.

I'm not a 'n1kka'. THAT'S 'White' supremacy you're spouting.



​

Dey didn't need to justify it because dey could JUST fukkIN DO IT...and get away wit it like dey've been doin for fukkin decades since dat Civil Rights era. What planet are you living on?

@ you thinkin shyt was/ is all good because dey possibly got/get some bad press hea n dere for shyttin on peaceful protesters sangin some old church hymns. FOH.


Bish nikka, don't you eva call somebody else stupid wit dat kinda nonsensical garbage pourin outta you.

 

[Dragonfly Jones]

if she wasn't such a ratchet hair hatted hooligan she'd be my fav person on the internet

 

[skeetsinternal]

the end of days