Religion/Spirituality Atheism Discussion

blackslash

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
-1,960
Daps
25,307
HIS CHARACTER, BROTHER! MEANING HE IS THE SUBJECT, DUDE! MEANING THIS CANNOT BE AN OBJECTIVE ETHICAL SYSTEM, CHAMP!


I'M NOT SURE WHAT SLAVE-OWNING MISOGYNIST RACISTS HAVE TO DO WITH THIS, BROTHER!

Yes morality is based on the first cause but the morality is objective because it pertains to all men and it is a concrete morality..one that transcends us and because of that is one that is objective. You seem to be misunderstanding me.

When I say "Objective morality" Im talkin bout in the sense of creation

Yes the creator is the foundation of this objective morality but the morality is objective in terms of creation
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,870
Daps
88,325
Reppin
nWg
Yes morality is based on the first cause but the morality is objective because it pertains to all men and it is a concrete morality.

NONE OF THESE THREE CONCLUSIONS FOLLOW FROM YOUR PREMISE, BROTHER!

1. A COSMIC FIRST CAUSE ISN'T AUTOMATICALLY THE SOURCE OF MORALITY, BROTHER! IF ZEUS WERE THE CREATOR, HE WOULD PERMIT HUMANS THEIR OWN MORAL SYSTEMS AT TIMES, AND AT OTHER TIMES WOULD ACT AS AN AUTHORITARIAN!

2. EVEN IF A CREATOR ESPOUSED AN ETHOS, IT WOULDN'T AUTOMATICALLY PERTAIN TO ANYONE UNLESS YOU'RE PROMOTING AUTHORITARIANISM AGAIN, DUDE!

3. IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CHRISTIAN GOD, IT'S HARD TO CALL HIS MORALITY CONCRETE, MEAN GENE! "THOU SHALT NOT MURDER. NOW GO WIPE OUT THESE CANAANITES, BROTHERS! AND SPRAY PAINT NWO ON THEM!" TO CALL THAT CONCRETE IS TO ONCE AGAIN APPEAL TO AUTHORITARIANISM, BROTHER!
 

blackslash

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Oct 9, 2012
Messages
17,946
Reputation
-1,960
Daps
25,307
NONE OF THESE THREE CONCLUSIONS FOLLOW FROM YOUR PREMISE, BROTHER!

1. A COSMIC FIRST CAUSE ISN'T AUTOMATICALLY THE SOURCE OF MORALITY, BROTHER! IF ZEUS WERE THE CREATOR, HE WOULD PERMIT HUMANS THEIR OWN MORAL SYSTEMS AT TIMES, AND AT OTHER TIMES WOULD ACT AS AN AUTHORITARIAN!

2. EVEN IF A CREATOR ESPOUSED AN ETHOS, IT WOULDN'T AUTOMATICALLY PERTAIN TO ANYONE UNLESS YOU'RE PROMOTING AUTHORITARIANISM AGAIN, DUDE!

3. IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CHRISTIAN GOD, IT'S HARD TO CALL HIS MORALITY CONCRETE, MEAN GENE! "THOU SHALT NOT MURDER. NOW GO WIPE OUT THESE CANAANITES, BROTHERS! AND SPRAY PAINT NWO ON THEM!" TO CALL THAT CONCRETE IS TO ONCE AGAIN APPEAL TO AUTHORITARIANISM, BROTHER!


1.That would be a valid point if I didnt give you the fact about men being created in the image of God..so objective morality which is transcedent of us, becomes truth. You keep bringing relativity into the equation as if Im trying to argue about how God is like.

No rather, Im trying to argue that objective morality comes from a creator who bestows upon us our worth and with that our morality based on the character of the creator.

And to your last point..Im not arguing bout that..murder is to unlawfully kill someone
kill doesnt equal murder

But like I said Im not arguing that..get back to the discussion I want you to address my actual question and point lemme re quote
"On the atheistic view, certain actions such as incest and rape may not be biologically and socially advantageous...so in the course of human development they've become taboo. But that does absolutely nothing to prove that rape or incest is wrong..cuz after all, that kind of behavior goes on all the time in the animal kingdom.

If the moral principles that govern our behavior are rooted in habit, custom, feeling and fashion, then the rapist that goes against the herd morality is doing nothing more serious than acting unfashionably. "

Am I wrong in saying this?
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,870
Daps
88,325
Reppin
nWg
the fact about men being created in the image of God
THIS IS A CLAIM, NOT A FACT, BROTHER!

You keep bringing relativity into the equation as if Im trying to argue about how God is like.
YOU'VE SELECTED A SPECIFIC GOD, SO YOU ARE ARGUING ABOUT HOW GOD IS LIKE, DUDE!

No rather, Im trying to argue that objective morality comes from a creator who bestows upon us our worth and with that our morality based on the character of the creator.
THIS IS WHY IT'S SUBJECTIVE AND NOT OBJECTIVE, BROTHER! AN OBJECTIVE MORALITY WOULD BE INDEPENDENT OF THE CHARACTER OF ANY INDIVIDUAL, INCLUDING THE CREATOR DEITY, DUDE!

And to your last point..Im not arguing bout that..murder is to unlawfully kill someone
kill doesnt equal murder
"IT'S WRONG UNLESS GOD COMMANDS IT!"

THIS IS AUTHORITARIANISM AT ITS MOST OBVIOUS, MEAN GENE!

"On the atheistic view, certain actions such as incest and rape may not be biologically and socially advantageous...so in the course of human development they've become taboo.
AN ATHEISTIC VIEW COULD ALSO FIND THESE THINGS TABOO BASED ON DEONTOLOGY, UTILITARIANISM, EGOISM, SITUATIONALISM, INTELLECTUALISM, WELFARISM, PRAGMATISM, OR VIRTUISM, BROTHER! YOU HAVE INCORRECTLY ASSUMED ATHEISM NECESSITATES AN ETHOS BASED PURELY ON SOCIAL DARWINISM, DUDE! IT DEMONSTRABLY DOES NOT!

But that does absolutely nothing to prove that rape or incest is wrong..cuz after all, that kind of behavior goes on all the time in the animal kingdom.
YOU ARE MAKING AN IS INTO AN OUGHT, BROTHER! A DESCRIPTION OF THE NATURAL WORLD DOES NOT PROVIDE A PRESCRIPTION FOR MORALS, NECESSARILY!

If the moral principles that govern our behavior are rooted in habit, custom, feeling and fashion, then the rapist that goes against the herd morality is doing nothing more serious than acting unfashionably. "
YOU'RE CONFLATING NATURE WITH FASHION NOW, CHAMP! A SOCIAL ANIMAL LIKE HOMO SAPIENS SURVIVES THROUGH ACCORD! FORCIBLE RAPE PRODUCES DISCORD, NOT MERE DISDAIN, BROTHER!

Am I wrong in saying this?
YES I BELIEVE I'VE SHOWN YOU THIS SEVERAL TIMES OVER NOW, DUDE!
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,641
Reppin
humans
Now, you're not differentiating between absolute morality (ought), relative morality (culture), and fact (is).

Wow. I just showed you how absolute morality does not exist. For absolute morality to exist, there has to be a Divine Presence to issue it. Morality from divinity has MANY issues, and this school of thought has already been absolutely destroyed by Plato/Socrates. Over 2000+ years ago by the way.





Wrong. My argument is that absolute morality exists. Period. My argument is valid by virtue of everyone on this planet having to use it in order to make moral judgments whether they want to admit it or not.



Who do you get your absolute morality from? If it exists outside of your existence, who provided it to you?



Here, let me ask it again: When is it appropriate to rape a baby?

Sometimes? Never? Maybe in the future?

To me? Never.

To others? I don't know, it's a subjective thing.

How do I know they don't find it morally right to rape a child in some alien planet?

I'll ask you this question:

Will the Earth stop orbiting the sun if a baby is raped? Will 1+1 cease being equal to 2? Will general relativity suddenly been wrong? Will a galaxy become sad? Will electron orbit clouds disappear?

Can you stop dodging and answer the questions above.

Will a child being raped have ANY significance to the universe outside of human consciousness and society?​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,493
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Hollywood Hogan said:
THE HINDUS SAY IT IS IMMORAL TO EAT BEEF! THE MUSLIMS SAY IT IS IMMORAL TO EAT PORK! THE CHRISTIANS ENJOY EATING BOTH!

WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVELY MORAL STANCE ON CONSUMING THESE FARMYARD ANIMALS, BROTHER?

Eating animals is 'good' because it is necessary for good health in humans.

What animals are consumed (or not) is a cultural distinction, not a moral one, unless you're a vegan.​
 

Berniewood Hogan

IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
17,983
Reputation
6,870
Daps
88,325
Reppin
nWg

What animals are consumed (or not) is a cultural distinction, not a moral one, unless you're a vegan.​
TELL THAT TO THE HINDUS AND MUSLIMS, BROTHER! THEY SAY IT IS MORALLY WRONG TO EAT THOSE ANIMALS! SO WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE VIEW, DUDE? YOU'RE PRETTY GOOD AT DODGING QUESTIONS, MEAN GENE!

AND WHAT'S THE OBJECTIVE MORAL STANCE ON VEGANISM, BROTHER?
 

Type Username Here

Not a new member
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
16,368
Reputation
2,385
Daps
32,641
Reppin
humans
dodgeball.jpg


Someone make a :dodge: smiley for use in this thread.
 

marcuz

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
55,000
Reputation
12,801
Daps
157,156
atheist aren't the ones killing people in the name of religion


if you need a book to tell you right from wrong, you're waste of flesh.
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,493
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Type Username Here said:
Wow. I just showed you how absolute morality does not exist. For absolute morality to exist, there has to be a Divine Presence to issue it. Morality from divinity has MANY issues, and this school of thought has already been absolutely destroyed by Plato/Socrates. Over 2000+ years ago by the way.

There doesn't have to be any 'Divine Presence' for absolute morality to exist. It exists out of necessity since everything is relative to an absolute.

Type Username Here said:
Who do you get your absolute morality from? If it exists outside of your existence, who provided it to you?

I have no idea, but trying to figure it out is intriguing.

Type Username Here said:
To me? Never.

This is a moral absolute that brooks no argument from me and renders your first sentence invalid since you can't use something that doesn't exist.

Type Username Here said:
To others? I don't know, it's a subjective thing.

All morals are subject to absolutes, though.

Type Username Here said:
How do I know they don't find it morally right to rape a child in some alien planet?

Would that make it 'right' for YOU to do it or anyone else on THIS planet?

Type Username Here said:
I'll ask you this question:

Will the Earth stop orbiting the sun if a baby is raped? Will 1+1 cease being equal to 2? Will general relativity suddenly been wrong? Will a galaxy become sad? Will electron orbit clouds disappear?

Can you stop dodging and answer the questions above.

None of those questions have anything to do with morality.

Type Username Here said:
Will a child being raped have ANY significance to the universe outside of human consciousness and society?

The Universe? No. Us? Yes.​
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,630
Reputation
8,094
Daps
121,493
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Hollywood Hogan said:
TELL THAT TO THE HINDUS AND MUSLIMS, BROTHER! THEY SAY IT IS MORALLY WRONG TO EAT THOSE ANIMALS! SO WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE VIEW, DUDE? YOU'RE PRETTY GOOD AT DODGING QUESTIONS, MEAN GENE!

Yet they DO eat other animals, which is what I stated in answer to your question. I haven't dodged anything. You musta got slammed a bit too many times on your head.

Hollywood Hogan said:
AND WHAT'S THE OBJECTIVE MORAL STANCE ON VEGANISM, BROTHER?

Ask a vegan. I'm enjoying a steak.....AND STOP FUKKING YELLING!!!!!​
 

OG_StankBrefs

Da Spice...
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,540
Reputation
6,715
Daps
98,663
Reppin
Caladan
Religion has nothing to do with absolute morality. If it did, then you wouldn't possess it.....yet, you do.

Shut your trollin' azz up.​

Breh you're da only one up in hea making it flagrantly obvious dat you dwell underneath a bridge. You aint foolin nobody wit dis bullshyt. You're just merely being humored at dis point. FOH bytch nikka. :heh:
 
Top