At What Income Level Is a Man Entitled to a Mistress?
- Thread starter MarcMan
- Start date
Hater Eraser
Veteran
OP fitting to learn about fukkin over ya fasho p*ssy tryna get so mo pussay
Rep
...
Y'all wouldn't.
MoshpitMazi
Moshpit Gxng/ Anti Fash
THERES NO INCOME LEVEL.
IF YOU CAN PULL IT OFF
YOU CAN PULL IT OFF
I'm not sure if there is any particular income bracket a man need to be in to have a mistress.
I guess it depends on the man because some men don't need to have a lot of money to have an understanding w/ his wife.
But, I will assume that the avg man who has an understanding with his wife may need to make enough money for the wife to not work @ all if she is gonna agree to an understanding..
I guess it depends on the man because some men don't need to have a lot of money to have an understanding w/ his wife.
But, I will assume that the avg man who has an understanding with his wife may need to make enough money for the wife to not work @ all if she is gonna agree to an understanding..
Hater Eraser
Veteran
But this is the thing- y’all act like women wouldn’t benefit from having a side dude as well.
Y’all think you are a pleasure to be around 24/7?? If you wife could sneak off and have moments with a man who can do things you can’t do, without having to clean the house, prepare his meals, wash his clothes, deal with his attitude when he comes home from a bad day at work, playing her role and being a present in-law in her hubby’s family by helping to care for his aging parents, being a good aunt to kids who might be unappreciative, etc. She needs a moment to get her back cracked too!
But naaaaaaw that would be wrong.
The point is EVERYONE would be happy to have someone fun on the side who doesn’t come with obligations.
But that’s what TF marriage is. And that’s what you sign up for when you sign that marriage license.
It’s understandable when a man “needs a break” or “someone new” but it’s unheard of that a woman might be dealing with similar stresses in a committed relationship.
Ah. Those are emotionally stunted women. I get it. Yea you can play that game with them.
They have one up on the side-chick but won’t acknowledge the real issue is the fact that their man made a woman his side chick.
Eh. Yea. I get it.
I’d just prefer ppl don’t speak about morals and shyt when there is nothing moral about that behavior.
What a lot of men don’t acknowledge or want to ignore is that just because you WANT other women doesn’t mean you’re supposed to have them.
If you’re actually in the church, part of your walk is denying your lust/carnal desires. That’s you taking your religion and marriage seriously.
So don’t bring up what women should/shouldn’t do when y’all are giving in to temptation.
Women aren’t supposed to sleep around because of some moral obligation; we aren’t supposed to sleep around because if we get pregnant you won’t know if you’re providing for YOUR seed or someone else’s. It’s not because of our emotions or whatever.
If Broderick Hunter sees your wife at dinner with her girls and lakes an offer, she isn’t going to dream about being his fukking wife
She’s going to enjoy a night with one of the finest men on this planet and go back home satisfied and happy to wash your draws and cook your dinner, EVEN when you come home with an attitude.
its about having enough money to where your main woman either turns a blind eye to it or welcomes it enthusiastically.
No she won'tI mean if you’re out the house doing you she just might do her thing separately as well
I'll divorce her ass
You gon be too happy and busy enjoying some new to even pay attentionNo she won't
I'll divorce her ass
You win
OP to answer your question the answer is none. And most of these answers are based on true mistresses.