I'm not changing the subject. You're being a hypocrite (and not even a Christian
). Your little brudda Swagmar, NEVER, I repeat, NEVER added anything of relevance to a discussion (unless it was about some drug) and would come into any thread, even the rare civil one, and call someone a fakkit, stupid, etc, etc. Where was the outrage then? Oh right, because he shares your viewpoint.
lol...outrage? There's not outrage on any front. I just pointed out you were contradicting yourself by talking about how atheists were "angry" all the while coming off ornery and insulting everyone in this this thread. Acri1 just gave his opinon some some shyt and you attacked him personally.
So now I can't point out your hypocrisy on this front without saying "Well Swagmar is insulting people too." Well gee, I apologize. Then I guess you have to go criticize Timbo716, Mowgli, Radamillz, LastEmperor2K2 and every other abrasive religious person as well.
And I attack KTL/HL because you all like to strut around and act if you're above the bullshyt when you're no different than any other forum.
Really? Examples? Because I post in HL more than you and I don't recall one single person every "strutting around and acting like they're above the bullshyt" ever. This must be your intellectual insecurity speaking again.
Constant thread derailments, e-beef, personality cults, cliques, empty co-signs, and if you you had a prominent female poster it'd probably be some simping there as well. Just be honest with yourselves and admit that you all aren't really receptive to alternative viewpoints.
I'm not sure what you mean by receptive to alternative viewpoints. It's a debate forum so shyt gets debated. It's also largely nonreligious and left-leaning, so naturally nonreligious left-leaning views will be the most prominent. Regarding e-beef, thread derailments, etc. that's just sohh/the coli. So it's e-beef mixed with debate.
Don't see what you're so emotional about.
Take a guy like KingpinOG for example; what makes him so different from any other poster? He expresses his partisan views in a brusque manner much like most of the left wing posters. But because you disagree with his politics he's a troll
.
KingpinOG is the example you use? One of the GOAT trolls in the history of the internet who practically wrote the manual on trolling??? I know KingpinOG a little better than you. I knew of him several years back when he, I and the poster getinthetruck (onedeen) posted on the old AOL board and I know for a fact he's a troll who doesn't believe a lot of the shyt he says and exaggerates a bunch of shyt for trolling effect and he does it on several site, not just here. He doesn't even deny he's a troll. You picked the worse possible example to try and convey your point.
And let's be real, I'm not the only one who thinks HL is a left wing circle jerk. I go in there to browse and check the Conspiracy or Documentary threads. Two of the few threads that are free of partisan bickering. Think about that; a Conspiracy thread is one of the only places "knowledge" can be shared without being called a fakkit. That tells me all I need to know about HL right there.
I doesn't matter whether you're the only person who thinks anything or not. The notion that you can't debate in HL without being called a fakkit is false. HL are generally civil toward people who present themself in a civil way. Whenever I see you there, you're always trolling or engaging in sarcastic mockery, so of course that's what you're going to get responded to with.
The bottom line is you're insecure because you can't keep up intellectually with some of the heads there. Less intelligent people often resent the smarter ones.
How about this? Let's me and you debate religion/God right now and promise to keep it 100%-free of insults, mockery, and trolling? Let's see how that turns out.