you cannot build any proper code of conduct when your ideology is flawed. according to
@Blackking:
black man + white woman = black kid
black man + asian woman = black kid
black man + latina woman = black kid
black man + indian woman = black kid
on this foundation alone, you've allowed too much diversity with non-black women to practice proper group economics. your wealth will see it's way over to the white, asian, latin, indian, etc community; as it's currently going right now. not to mention your non-black partners will not always agree with your "pro-black" code.
okay, and? is this the scare tactics you'll use against biracials/mixed folks who choose not to identify as AA? guess what, dummy. how white supremacist treat biracials has nothing to do with how WE view biracials/mixed folk. this underlying agenda that you nikkas have for non-black is destructive and creates a drain in a community. once you believe biracials are "in the tribe," you automatically make the white woman (or non-black woman) that created them acceptable.
stop playing dumb, idiot. you support the one drop rule just like a large chunk of blacks. you believe black men and women can create black children with a non-black partner; that's the one drop rule.
it creates a positive identity based on how the majority looks. blacks are already being misrepresented by biracials and we're allowing them to be promoted/elevated over AA's as the acceptable buffer class. its harmful for any racial agenda to allow outsiders into your tribe, which is why EVERY OTHER GROUP rejects the one drop rule--THEY DONT ACCEPT OUTSIDERS WITH OPEN ARMS LIKE YOU DUNCE CAPS.
exactly why are y'all talking about building, building, building; only to go wife a non-black woman? then you sitting there looking stupid like dame dash when y'all wealth gets snatched and taken to THEIR communities.