You don't have a point.You truly struggle with reading comprehension.
instead of arguing semantics of the label I put on those issues you should’ve tried to actually comprehend the point being made which was around the question of if these guys were playing at their best, not if these non bball () issues affected the game.
You missed the mark, altogether, and are completely ignorant of the fact that these aren't the normal conditions to what is a regular playoff settting. In your fumbling attempt to contrast what happened in 1959 as opposed to what happens today, as a reflection of how things have changed over time, you failed to realize that these conditions don't run parallel to what happened last season, and the likelihood of them not running parallel to what happens next season. This bubble shyt is a deviation from the norm; it is not changing of the times, or moving forward, or any type of progression of the state of the world. Travel, fans/crowd, atmosphere minutiae are all going to return - those basketball factors will be in play again - barring we don't end up in a basketball-dystopia.
Which is why I initially put forth a counter-argument of: how are we witnessing how good everyone is without those additional pressures, when those additional pressures are the standard, and ultimately shape our perception of the players and the game. Those pressures will be there next season. Does that mean we won't be witnessing how good everyone really is next year when those pressures return, does that mean we've been lying to ourselves this whole time watching a game where we don't get to see how good everyone is, and does that mean that all those basketball factors shouldn't be used as an estimation when valuing what happens going forward?