all you have to do to fukk with this logic is say "well, since handguns and 'assault rifles' are the same, then ban assault rifles because a handgun does the same thing, right?"....and watch gun nuts start juelzing.
Are there any bigger retards than people who 'draw the line' at assault weapons?
- Thread starter CarbonBraddock
- Start date
Methuselah
Banned
did you know that black people in the US did not have a constitutional rights until this magical thing called an amendment
Yes, an amendment is why we have rights in this country, and what you’re advocating for is the removal of an amendment. Fortunately, for black people, amendments die hard.bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
great. then you answered your own question. laws are subject to change, even the constitution
when you know better, you do better!
TreySav
D-Block General
Bro did a 5 min google search and came back a subject matter expert. You won’t be getting a rocket launcher or the explosive shell in a week bud, but feel free to think that
The way i see it, and i'll leave it at this.
I love guns and i like having gun rights. I own several including an Ar-15.
but i don't see why that means i should be pro mass shootings like some other gun people are.
NRA types aren't just fighting against weapons bans, they are fighting against background checks, Training, Licensing, Mental Health Evaluations and any other alternative solution to this Mass shooting epidemic that people come up with. People who are against Gun Bans don't usually offer up any practical alternative solutions to gun violence outside of more guns. And that bothers me as a responsible gun owner, because it encourages irresponsible gun ownership. screaming "it's my right" just isn't a good solution imo.
I love guns and i like having gun rights. I own several including an Ar-15.
but i don't see why that means i should be pro mass shootings like some other gun people are.
NRA types aren't just fighting against weapons bans, they are fighting against background checks, Training, Licensing, Mental Health Evaluations and any other alternative solution to this Mass shooting epidemic that people come up with. People who are against Gun Bans don't usually offer up any practical alternative solutions to gun violence outside of more guns. And that bothers me as a responsible gun owner, because it encourages irresponsible gun ownership. screaming "it's my right" just isn't a good solution imo.
The NRA doesn't speak for all of us as gun owners so it's nice to see groups like NAAGA, USCCA, etc take the forefront.
Also agreed - as someone who is a responsible gun owner, who trains, etc many gun owners irritate the fukk out of me with their rhetoric and make us all look bad.
east
Screwed up... till tha casket drops!!
oh word? my tax receipts say otherwise, that's approved by the chief of atf's explosives import branch. god i love the internet, you have retards running their mouths on shyt they didn't even know existed until they read a post on a hip hop message board.
the nra's only useful as a scapegoat which i found funny cause they never really did any good lmao. i honestly can't think of a single gun owner under 70 who approves of them, even the old boomers are writing them out of their wills and shyt. zoomers are all about supporting goa/fpc/saf which are not well known by antis but are even more extremist and actually get shyt done in court. they're far less tolerant of gun control than our generation, mashallah.
Last edited:
Godless Socialist CEO
Superstar
OP been consuming too much of that conspirators shyt. There’s a direct correlation between the ban on assult weapons being allowed to expire and an increase in murders. Some of the worst acts of mass shootings was committed with what is essentially military grade weaponry.
Citizens are too irresponsible to use that weaponry and they don’t need them for “defense purposes”.
It’s sad seeing the average citizen use the kind of talking points the NRA and gun manufacturers pay politicians millions to use in defending the wide spread use of this weaponry. It’s also low key you saying you don’t give a fukk who dies as long as you can buy those guns which to be Frank I’d respect a lot more than all the crap you typed
@CarbonBraddock
Citizens are too irresponsible to use that weaponry and they don’t need them for “defense purposes”.
It’s sad seeing the average citizen use the kind of talking points the NRA and gun manufacturers pay politicians millions to use in defending the wide spread use of this weaponry. It’s also low key you saying you don’t give a fukk who dies as long as you can buy those guns which to be Frank I’d respect a lot more than all the crap you typed
@CarbonBraddock
The gun ownership landscape is changing. Although small, more and more people are learning how to use guns safely and responsibly.
Godless Socialist CEO
Superstar
Ok that’s fine you still don’t need military grade weaponry. No one does
Methuselah
Banned
Let's try this again. If the 2nd amendment can be ripped out of the constitution, why can't the 13th amendment, ( which ended slavery ), the 14th amendment ( which gave black people born in America citizenship ), the 15th amendment ( which gave black men the right to vote ), or the19th amendment ( which gave women the right vote )?
The constitution is changed through amendments which are additions that are meant to improve legislation. It almost never is improved by removing amendments. The only amendment that's ever been repealed is the 18th amendment which ended the prohibition.
OP is an a$$hole but isn’t entirely wrong. I bet there are a lot of people who are completely fed up with the gun shyt but won’t say aloud. I know I’m about there but have always towed the 2A line. But I don’t know that I care to continue equivocating over so-called “assault” rifles or whatever when all that shyt is fukked up.
bourgeoisie tall freak
Superstar
i never said it had to be an amendment and i never said it had to be "ripped out". it could very easliy be clarified or added onto to fit the times. my point was laws can change and legal interpretations of what is a constitutional right can change. when you know better you do better, that's why they call the constitution a "living document". you come into a debate spouting "well its a constitutional right" doesn't mean squat and is pretty intellectually lazy
Last edited:
The Black Panthers, Deacons of Defense, and other groups during the Civil Rights Movement protected our brothers and sisters when they were engaged in protest.
To say we don't need tools to defend our communities no matter how 'scary' they are is a slap in the face to our ancestors.
When George W Bush didn't send in the National Guard into New Orleans during Katrina they were left there defenseless. It was a crime to leave them there. We need to be able to defend ourselves.
I know you're "Liberal" but many leftists and socialists would argue that the elite having all the arms and the proletariat are defenseless is dangerous.
I'm for reform but to say a certain group of people don't need weapons is not a good argument nor, as I mentioned, the use of a firearm is not one size fits all.