Those who vote no on the sponsor list will be primaried by someone who does support M4A, they hopefully win and then we will have more support in government for the legislation. Doing it during a pandemic when 14.6 million and counting have lost their health insurance makes the issue particularly timely and sentiment for it at an all-time high. I just 'explained that'. lol
And it's funny the political commentators on youtube against this also get a lot views, make a lot of money etc. I don't begrudge them of that since they are donations. Meanwhile, you got mainstream media figures like Rachel Maddow making $30K a day fukk a month and they get it from weapons manufacturers, pharmacudical companies and whatever else corporate sponsors run commercials during these 24 hour news stations. But that's journalism not any type of grift. lol
You didn't explain anything. You just told me what you 'hope.'
What happens when those who don't support M4A get primaried but their challenger loses their election in general?
What happens when those who don't support M4A win their primary challenges and get reelected?
What happens when they lose to a Republican, who wouldn't even entertain the idea of even a public option because it's 'socialized medicine'?
Since the cosponsor list wasn't good enough because "anybody can say they cosponsor a bill," what happens when people vote yes just because they don't want to get primaried? Is that good enough or does the goalpost move to "they only voted yes because they were pressured"?
What happens when a centrist goes, "fukk you and your primary
," votes no, and faces no consequences in their reelection bid?
What happens if someone who voted yes still loses their reelection and now you have one less vote for it?
What happens when, if by some miracle this passes, but doesn't even get brought to the floor of the Senate?
What happens when Democrats lost the House, as they are expected to do in 2022, and this conversation is off the table for the next two years?
How many cycles is this going to have to go on for? How many times are we going to have to go through the motions of "see who voted yes, primary who voted no, hope their primary challengers win, repeat" until this actually passes?
This is the problem with these performative progressives. Yeah, it's cool to go, "fukk all centrists. We're gonna primary them, and if we can't, but you lose to a Republican, that's your problem," but right now, there are more of them in congress than there are of you, so if that's how you want to play the game, it's going to take a very long time to get what you want.
Doesn't sound very 'accelerationist' to me.