oh, i don't want Newsom at all in 2028. i want Shapiro out of PA
Newsom was '24 or bust. his career is over. he doesn't even have a Senate path he can go for
AOC asked her followers who voted for both her and Trump why they did it? The responses are interesting to say the least.
- Thread starter Elim Garak
- Start date
Newsom was '24 or bust. his career is over. he doesn't even have a Senate path he can go for
Cave Savage
Feminist
housing hasn't, at all. and apparently groceries haven't (although i don't notice that, so i think that's just people bytching. groceries are not that bad right now.)
either way, biden/harris was thoroughly rejected. we didn't even win the popular vote
A lot of the "groceries are expensive!" sentiment is pushed by right wing millionaire podcasters/influencers who buy luxury groceries and intentionally lie to their audiences
As for housing ; Walz was on the ticket and his state has tackled the housing issue successfully. Republicans are generally NIMBYs and block new housing development other than suburban tract housing.
Bigblackted4
Superstar
Superdelegates pledging for Clinton early in the primary campaign. public perception was that Clinton held a commanding lead before many states even held their votes. this could be seen as the democratic establishment choosing the candidate instead of letting the people decide in state votes. it's not literally "the DNC" but the people who were superdelegates are all party bigwigs and made up the majority of important DNC membership so it's basically the same thing. The backlash against this was so strong, it caused a rules change at the convention where Bernie lost, to prevent the same thing from happening again. Now superdelegates are awarded based on state primary results in the first round (at the convention) and then are free to vote for whomever if there's a second round.
But forget all of that what about what the courts said:
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.
observer.com
Bigblackted4
Superstar
This is true but I just looked at something saying Austin Texas has also tackled it's housing problem too and Texas is def Republican.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
I think Kamala had the same plan just doing it at a slower pace. Everyone knows Nap
Nap all your hard work on this site hasn't paid off. How does it feel to know you wasted years of your life spamming for a cause that died a few days ago?!
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
He really thought people forgot or something. lolSuperdelegates pledging for Clinton early in the primary campaign. public perception was that Clinton held a commanding lead before many states even held their votes. this could be seen as the democratic establishment choosing the candidate instead of letting the people decide in state votes. it's not literally "the DNC" but the people who were superdelegates are all party bigwigs and made up the majority of important DNC membership so it's basically the same thing. The backlash against this was so strong, it caused a rules change at the convention where Bernie lost, to prevent the same thing from happening again. Now superdelegates are awarded based on state primary results in the first round (at the convention) and then are free to vote for whomever if there's a second round.
But forget all of that what about what the courts said:
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.
Superdelegates pledging for Clinton early in the primary campaign. public perception was that Clinton held a commanding lead before many states even held their votes. this could be seen as the democratic establishment choosing the candidate instead of letting the people decide in state votes. it's not literally "the DNC" but the people who were superdelegates are all party bigwigs and made up the majority of important DNC membership so it's basically the same thing. The backlash against this was so strong, it caused a rules change at the convention where Bernie lost, to prevent the same thing from happening again. Now superdelegates are awarded based on state primary results in the first round (at the convention) and then are free to vote for whomever if there's a second round.
But forget all of that what about what the courts said:
Court Concedes DNC Had the Right to Rig Primaries Against Sanders
The court affirmed that the DNC and Debbie Wasserman Schultz held a palpable bias in favor Hillary Clinton.
superdelegates could do that, thats the entire point. The fact bernie bros bytched about didn’t mean it violated the bylaws of the party.
Your own link supports this. Nothing outside of party rules was broken. Had bernie actually been a member of the party, he’d have tried to use his DECADES of political experience to woo party delegates. He didn’t then cried when he lost.
AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Brazile: Hillary Rigged DNC Against Bernie
The former DNC chair claimed Hillary Clinton's campaign reached an agreement with the DNC to take over the party's operations 15 months before last year's general election.
www.newsweek.com
Donna Brazile seems confused on the subject. But lemme guess you know more than her.
Bigblackted4
Superstar
That's the point though. Why try and sway the public when you could just let it play out with the voters. They also tried to do it to Obama too but he was just too good of a candidate.
Pull Up the Roots
I have a good time when I go out of my mind..
The political environment today, compared to 2008, 2012, and even 2016, is radically different, rendering this comparison moot.
Donna likes to pander to people although she’ll admit nothing wrong was done. That “rigged” language is political chum to disaffected idiots.Brazile: Hillary Rigged DNC Against Bernie
The former DNC chair claimed Hillary Clinton's campaign reached an agreement with the DNC to take over the party's operations 15 months before last year's general election.
Donna Brazile seems confused on the subject. But lemme guess you know more than her.
If this was the case, you’d have chosen a better example than a judge refuting your own example
The entire superdelegate system existed before Bernie’s campaign…hell, barely before I was born
Superdelegate - Wikipedia
Cave Savage
Feminist
Austin is blue though. And its housing policy/cost of living are still worse than that of Minneapolis.
Bigblackted4
Superstar
It's not the system it's them pledging their votes before that everyone had a problem with.The entire superdelegate system existed before Bernie’s campaign…hell, barely before I was born
Superdelegate - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
they literally, could do that, under the rules permitted
You’re arguing that you didn’t like that something was allowed